Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Prairie Estates

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Frisco
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    My mother had a stroke and was placed at Prairie Estates for rehab. Some of the nurses were nice, others were nasty towards her. The administration was the worst. They were ALWAYS at lunch no matter what time of day I called. They never returned phone calls. I actually called the head nurse, Carla while I was in the building and was told she was "not in today." When I walked down the hallway she was sitting there eating barbecue. When your loved one arrives, you are supposed to have a meeting with the therapists and staff 7 days after your arrival. Never happened. On day 30 I finally got some staff to meet with us, but the therapists and doctor did not attend the meeting. I was given lots of excuses as to why they have not done their jobs. I could give lots of examples, like how the help buzzers just ring for hours or how the patients just sit in their wheelchairs in the hallways for hours. The social worker, Hunter was absolutely no help. I visited my mom every day for 90 days and rarely saw anyone improve. It is a very sad place. I am so glad I moved my mom to a place that treats her with dignity and respect.

  • ★★★★★ in the last week

    I can understand why people take their parents out of here and relocate them. I attempted to call Praire Estates 3 times within an hour. The 1st call was answered by someone with pot communication skills and I was put on hold for 12 minutes. That was fine and all except I only had a quick question so I hung up and called back. After some more poor communication and phone skills, I was transferred and on hold until another person answered and I still had no clue what they were saying. Maybe they should clean house and change administration. I got the answer I needed, continue searching for something better. If you can't handle a phone, you can't handle healthcare. Best of luck to this business.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    Not much going on today, more people working than we usually see on the weekends

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    Prairie Estates is AWFUL!!!!! Do NOT put your loved ones in this place. Don't make the same mistake, do your research and don't be fooled. Stay away!!!

  • ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I would not give them at least one star but I'm going to be nice. You're not gonna like it there they take forever to help you. And they don't even do your job. All they do is watched YouTube video.

About Prairie Estates

General Information

Legal Business NameDallas County Hospital District
Ownership TypeGovernment - Hospital District
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 13, 2007 (10 years)
Capacity180
Residents154
Percent Occupied86%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Prairie Estates

Prairie Estates
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 28, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

September 4, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Prairie Estates require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 40min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 15min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

31.8%
85.7%
85.8%
85.8%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
99.3%
100.0%
99.3%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
60.3%
50.9%
52.3%
49.2%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.3%
23.0%
23.6%
22.3%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
26.1%
29.8%
27.7%
22.7%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
18.9%
16.5%
11.6%
14.2%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.5%
25.4%
25.0%
21.7%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.4%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.6%
3.0%
3.0%
8.1%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.2%
6.5%
6.8%
9.2%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.5%
3.7%
4.9%
6.3%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.7%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

85.8%
89.8%
94.9%
96.8%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
9.3%
86.0%
86.0%
86.0%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
49.7%
52.8%
48.0%
51.2%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
1.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
2.2%
1.1%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places