Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Woodridge Nursing & Rehabilitation

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Houston
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 1.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ in the last week

    The staff in this place are so rude with their patients. I went there to visit my dad, as I was walking to the hallway i heard a nurse yelling to an old lady. Definitely this is not a good place for sick and old people

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I took mom in December she was fine . Just needed to learn to walk again. I had to leave town for two days. I came back she's dehydrated!!! They don't bother to give an IV till I asked the nurse could they do something. The next day I took her to ER. She's fighting for her life!!! Doctors don't give her many days!!!

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    It has been several years since I took my brother out of this poor excuse for a care center. It was depressing to go there, and the staff, particularly the person posing as a social worker, was dreadful. I wish there was a review category with minus five. I have had my brother in another facility actually owned by the same group as Woodridge. There the facility and staff have been exceptionally good for the past three years.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mother has been here for a number of months now and they have gone above and beyond to take care of her medical needs. Ofc there are some tiny issues about stuff like her candy coming up missing but it is a nursing home. Some people who live there have memmory loss. They take them in groups out on trips from time to time. So overall I love this place. My mother is not a easy person to deal with. with the notion that this is not her first nursing home and they meet her needs and handle her with care. Verry pleased as a family member of one of the patients there. Kudos!

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    The lack of dignity afforded the residents is truly a disgrace. DO NOT GO HERE. The ratio of caregivers to residents is horrific, almost unbelievable (15 patients to one aid, and 30+ for one nurse). I feel sorry for the staff, truly I do. However, I feel the most compassion for the residents. The ones who get the most attention are the very ones who do NOT need it, but since they require no assistance, they chat with every worker therefore keeping the aid, nurse from doing their job. The more cantankerous the residence, the more grief they are given and the more privileges they are denied. These people are not merely physically handicapped, they ARE psychologically handicapped. Few carry on full-fledged conversations - most moan, moan or grunt, at best. If this facility can't deal with that, then they need to shut it down.

About Woodridge Nursing & Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NamePinnacle Health Facilities Xv Lp
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Individual
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 5, 1999 (19 years)
Capacity174
Residents120
Percent Occupied69%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Woodridge Nursing & Rehabilitation

Woodridge Nursing & Rehabilitation
was reviewed by to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 12, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

August 21, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a detailed, written plan for disasters and emergencies, such as fire, severe weather, and missing residents.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Woodridge Nursing & Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 20min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

88.3%
83.9%
83.9%
83.9%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.3%
94.4%
98.2%
98.3%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
55.2%
62.2%
65.0%
57.9%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
29.4%
32.4%
31.1%
32.7%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
25.1%
26.9%
35.3%
23.9%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.1%
29.8%
21.1%
22.9%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
22.6%
23.2%
30.2%
26.9%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
1.2%
1.5%
4.6%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.6%
5.7%
9.7%
9.4%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.8%
10.0%
7.9%
14.7%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.1%
0.0%
1.9%
1.8%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.9%
9.3%
8.8%
5.1%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.8%
2.8%
1.8%
0.0%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2%
1.5%
1.2%
3.2%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

75.8%
69.0%
81.4%
81.4%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
37.7%
67.2%
67.2%
67.2%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
2.9%
3.4%
-
5.0%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.7%
4.0%
-
-
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.7%
1.6%
1.8%
1.9%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places