Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Bishop Davies Nursing Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Hurst
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Love this place the owner is always there helping out in the building. Nurses and aides are very attentive to patient needs like every nursing home there are minor concerns but Administrator is very knowledgeable and jumped right on top of it. I would definitely recommend this home to all my family and friends.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    We had as pleasant experience as could be expected from a nursing home. The good- They told me they were open 24-7 to stop by for a visit to see if we were interested in placing my sister here whenever I wanted to. They work hard/fast to get your loved one placed here if you need Medicaid assistance. They had my sister processed and accepted within two months. Another facility said they didn't think they could get her approved. She was under hospice care, with terminal cancer. The employees work hard and we received excellent care especially from Elise the nurse that worked weekends in the 400 section and our beloved Ruby who worked tirelessly to take care of my sis, and really cared and loved her to the end. The food/nutrition-my sister had to have pureed food and gained 20 lbs in two months, which helped sustain her for the end when she got real thin again ad unable to eat. There was a nurse that was camping out instead of working in my sister's room when she first moved in which was making my sister miserable. After a couple of complaints this was taken care of. Thank you Bishop Davies for taking care of my sister, Deb!!

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    The people in the office are the rudest people I have ever met!

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I understand some reviews are negative but I disagree completely. Their service and professionalism to Us has been above and beyond. I could detail the reasons I feel this way but I highly recommend this facility to anyone.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Overall this place is one of the best my father has stayed at. I get calls on a regular bases from staff if his medication or status changes. They are open to visiting time but that can be a minus as well because people kind of come and go as far as visitors. Just research be involved ask questions and get what you want.

About Bishop Davies Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameBishop Healthcare, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 14, 1986 (32 years)
Capacity161
Residents130
Percent Occupied81%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Bishop Davies Nursing Center

Bishop Davies Nursing Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 25, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

October 23, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Bishop Davies Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
15min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

81.2%
90.2%
90.2%
90.2%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.2%
98.4%
96.8%
97.5%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
66.7%
44.9%
69.2%
54.9%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.8%
34.3%
33.7%
36.8%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
32.1%
20.7%
37.0%
24.0%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.5%
19.7%
22.0%
22.9%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.0%
20.9%
30.8%
29.5%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.0%
3.8%
5.4%
4.4%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
1.6%
16.4%
12.8%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.0%
8.4%
8.6%
8.2%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.1%
3.2%
2.5%
2.8%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.5%
4.0%
3.3%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.3%
4.7%
4.8%
5.0%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.7%
2.4%
1.3%
1.2%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.9%
91.8%
85.2%
85.9%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
57.7%
73.6%
73.0%
73.0%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
65.5%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
10.4%
11.1%
11.9%
14.3%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.1%
0.0%
3.4%
0.0%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places