Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rayburn Health Care & Rehabilitation

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Jasper
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Melissa Dietz
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    awful place...DO NOT send your loved one here !!! Looks nice from outside but horrible service to patients on the inside....Don't judge a book by its cover !!! I should have read the reviews that were posted and now looks like have been deleted. They had so many bad reviews and we should have listen to them but we thought oh its such a nice clean place. WRONG the patient care is the key to me and this place does not have any patient care quality !

  • Thomas Goodie
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    The neglect of my mother-in-law was unreal. She was so impacted from not going to the bathroom, she almost died. Don't believe their lies of "concern" with your loved ones.

  • Angie Mobley
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    My sister is staying here for rehab and so far everything is good

  • Kyle Sipes
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

About Rayburn Health Care & Rehabilitation

General Information

Legal Business NameSweet Neches Properties, Ltd.
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 10, 2011 (7 years)
Capacity107
Residents68
Percent Occupied64%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rayburn Health Care & Rehabilitation

Rayburn Health Care & Rehabilitation
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 28, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

August 25, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

October 23, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 27 days
---Fine$650 fine
---Fine$1,950 fine
---Fine$3,900 fine

February 19, 2014 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$2,302 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rayburn Health Care & Rehabilitation require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 50min
3hr 60min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.6%
98.6%
98.6%
98.6%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
14.8%
12.5%
11.1%
27.0%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.3%
29.5%
32.1%
20.0%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
4.8%
6.6%
9.2%
9.6%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
25.0%
20.6%
20.6%
22.1%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
7.3%
3.6%
8.2%
21.6%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.0%
9.9%
13.1%
3.6%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
13.6%
11.4%
23.1%
9.9%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.6%
2.4%
5.9%
5.6%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.8%
6.1%
3.2%
1.6%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15.2%
14.3%
9.2%
7.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
13.4%
12.7%
7.5%
2.8%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3%
1.4%
1.4%
5.1%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.9%
92.9%
92.9%
92.9%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
2.3%
6.7%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
2.0%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places