Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regent Care Center Of League City

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. League City
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    A beautiful place to look at. But if your loved one needs memory care...they will tell you that they specialize in memory care. But actually they do NOT! My sisters and I placed our father there, and after 3 days..they demanded that we either come get our father or have him moved within 2 weeks. If not....they would have him moved to another facility of there choice. We were not pleased with our fathers treatment, especially after being told one thing..and they did something else.

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Hard to even give them a 1 star!! Horrible care. My mom was there 1 week and they almost killed her by not treating her infection they were aware she had!! Numerous times I arrived and she couldn't reach her call button or water. They would leave her in her feces until it was "time" (every 3-4 hrs) to change her. I would never send a human there. People are treated better in prison!!

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I've read a lot of the comments that was left about Regent Care in Webster Texas and I don't agree with the majority of it my experience was very nice. My mother was there temporarily after she was released from the hospital for physical therapy. They treated her with respect they treated her very nicely she found ways of getting around, meeting new people and fou d a new hobby, puzzles. yes they did put her in a wheelchair but it wasn't for their convenience but for her safety. People don't realize that this is a nursing facility and that these people are doing the best they can with the resources that they have if you were that adamant about your parents or your loved one you should have left them at home with you.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    The Best

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Both my parents were at this facility. Nurses and assistants are not properly trained. My dad has Alzheimers.. When my mother passed away... as we were trying to arrange the funeral for her, nurses at the facility would call us to tell us that we needed to be there with him . We were told they were too busy there to just attend to him. We were called almost every day and told that we HAD to be there to watch him till he fell asleep , which was about 10 or 11 pm. Some of the nurses there were rude and very unprofessional. We were not given the chance to look for another location and he was put out to the first facility they found available right after I asked for the administrative name to report them. That was the worst experience I've had at any place.. if they had a negative star i would give them that instead of 1

About Regent Care Center Of League City

General Information

Legal Business NameRegent Care Center Of League City, Limited Partnership
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 12, 2007 (10 years)
Capacity194
Residents141
Percent Occupied73%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regent Care Center Of League City

Regent Care Center Of League City
was reviewed by to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 11, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionTrain all employees on what to do in an emergency, and carry out unannounced staff drills.

January 12, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

October 20, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

August 6, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTrain all employees on what to do in an emergency, and carry out unannounced staff drills.

April 1, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

February 26, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regent Care Center Of League City require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 55min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 55min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

68.9%
81.8%
81.8%
81.8%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.3%
97.6%
96.1%
95.2%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
55.6%
50.0%
60.6%
57.7%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.2%
21.7%
23.6%
23.7%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
11.3%
6.0%
13.0%
15.1%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
12.6%
15.4%
15.2%
10.7%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.7%
17.2%
16.3%
25.2%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
1.3%
0.0%
2.2%
4.1%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
12.4%
9.6%
10.2%
16.0%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
2.2%
3.2%
5.4%
6.5%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.9%
1.8%
0.9%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
15.7%
15.2%
18.9%
20.8%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.8%
0.8%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.3%
3.4%
3.2%
2.2%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

84.5%
82.0%
86.7%
77.3%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
58.0%
70.6%
70.6%
70.0%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
36.7%
44.1%
32.4%
49.4%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
14.0%
16.0%
17.9%
9.8%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.3%
1.3%
1.7%
1.8%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places