Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Kindred Transitional Care And Rehabilitation-Mansf

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Mansfield
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Melody Hall
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    If you want the staff to ignore your loved one go here. Staff is too busy on their phones to care about what is going on with their patients or to help when asked. Would not recommend

  • Clyde Wallace
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Enjoyed the stay at Kindred. The nurses and CNAs were professional and caring. Hats goes off to Trina, Chris Rebecca but all did a fantastic job.

  • cdw626
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This location is just another HORRIBLE Kindred facility. My mother came into this place with a bed sore that was about the size of a egg and healing. Due to the complete lack of ANY care from the so called wound care specialists there, she ended up in ICU not once but TWICE! The first time she had a severe UTI and the wound had doubled in size. She was in a special wound hospital for a month due to that. She should have been moved after that but they assured us that they had a new wound staff now and things would change and it would get better. Well, yeah, she is once again in ICU with a SEVERE blood infection, SEVERE UTI and SEVERE abdominal infection. The wound had almost tripled from its original size, and the wound care staff had been saying it was getting smaller and better. They had been lying the ENTIRE time to us. Instead of just admitting to us that they couldn't take care of her properly, they have almost killed her! She had been transferred now, but she may not even make it to her new facility now. The only person in that place that cared about her was the Administrator Mr. Emodi. But he couldn't set and hold their hands all day and monitor each and every staff member nonstop, he had other important things to do. It is the Drs and Nurses who should have been holding people accountable. I don't know how those Drs and Nurses sleep at night knowing they aren't taking care of people. It's a horrible shame.

  • Evert Lamascus
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    MY WIFE IS IN KINDRED. SHE IS I FOR THE LONG HALL. SURE THERE R THINGS THAT ARE NOT UP TO SNUFF BUT ALL IN ALL IT IS A PRETTY GOOD PLACE. WE GO UP TO SEE MY WIFE EVERYDAY JUST TO VISIT AND KEEP AN EYE OUT FOR THINGS. NOT MANY COMPLAINTS EXCEPT THE FOOD IS AWFUL. WE BRING MY WIFE DINNER EVERY NIGHT.

  • Twyla Lee
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    There is NO WAY in GODS green that all the previous reviews are right! If you LOVE and CHERISH your love one my family and I BEG and PLEAD you DONT take them to the MANSFIELD or RIDGMAR location! There is not hate stemming from our hearts, there isn't a person ALIVE who should have to experience the care we received from the MANSFIELD location! A BEAUTIFUL LIFE WAS LOST UNDER THEIR CARE! We experienced... INFECTIONS, UNKNOWN SORES, NEGLECT, AND UNSANITARY ATMOSPHERE, and FAILED COMMUNICATION! I we can SAVE just one LIFE, our job is DONE!

About Kindred Transitional Care And Rehabilitation-Mansf

General Information

Legal Business NameDecatur Hospital Authority
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 1, 2007 (10 years)
Capacity118
Residents95
Percent Occupied81%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Kindred Transitional Care And Rehabilitation-Mansf

Kindred Transitional Care And Rehabilitation-Mansf
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

May 12, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.

May 28, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Kindred Transitional Care And Rehabilitation-Mansf require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 40min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 20min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
50min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 55min
4hr 45min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

75.3%
68.0%
68.0%
68.0%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
98.5%
93.8%
80.3%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
78.3%
66.7%
-
-
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
44.8%
27.4%
35.9%
27.6%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
23.2%
37.0%
11.0%
24.4%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.8%
16.7%
21.9%
23.0%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.6%
16.9%
9.8%
16.4%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.6%
7.7%
15.7%
-
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.7%
4.5%
3.3%
11.9%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.8%
5.6%
13.0%
9.4%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
2.1%
3.1%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6%
4.5%
4.9%
27.1%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1%
3.0%
6.2%
3.3%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
7.9%
6.9%
1.8%
4.5%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.6%
96.3%
95.0%
89.3%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
51.0%
73.5%
73.5%
73.5%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
74.5%
69.2%
60.7%
64.8%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
35.7%
11.1%
17.4%
-
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.5%
1.6%
3.5%
4.5%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.8%
0.8%
0.6%
0.6%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places