Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Pasadena
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente

General Information

Legal Business NameBaywood Crenshaw LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 12, 2012 (5 years)
Capacity124
Residents114
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente

Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 18, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssure that each residentís assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.

July 8, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,268 fine
---Fine$1,268 fine
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.

March 20, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Baywood Crossing Rehabilitation & Healthcare Cente require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
20min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 20min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.5%
97.4%
97.4%
97.4%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
98.0%
99.0%
99.0%
98.9%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
69.7%
64.8%
61.5%
71.1%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
32.6%
31.9%
30.3%
23.8%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
28.5%
23.0%
20.0%
12.7%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.9%
22.2%
18.8%
26.1%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
19.5%
13.6%
15.1%
26.0%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.6%
1.1%
1.1%
2.4%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.2%
4.0%
4.2%
5.6%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.1%
11.1%
12.2%
14.7%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.1%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.4%
2.3%
2.7%
2.6%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.5%
92.7%
88.0%
76.9%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
76.8%
95.1%
95.1%
95.1%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
64.6%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
24.0%
12.9%
13.6%
9.1%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.8%
3.2%
3.3%
3.2%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.6%
1.8%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened