Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Tuscany Village

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Texas
  3. Pearland Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Keith Browne
    ★★★★★ 4 weeks ago

    This place is great if you want to leave your loved one at a facility that: drops them in the shower and doesn't tell you, cusses at them, fails to follow through on repeated requests for medical services and steals your loved ones belongings. Horrible facility. Response: the facility did not notify the patients family and it had to be brought to their attention when the patient was observed by their family. There was a bruise. It is u fortunate that the facility cannot take this feedback to improve their staff.

  • Plus Keeping
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    This place is not safe to visit. The owner consistently refuses to install security cameras outside in the parking lot and family members and employees cars are being broken into all times of the day with no support from the owner to stop this madness. I was told it has been happening for years and the owner refuses to take any actions. The employees fear the robbers will soon become aggressive and enter the building and begin to rob the employees and residence during the late hours. The owner has no consideration for security threats that are taking place at this establishment. PLEASE STAY AWAY! TUSCANY VILLAGE IS NOT SAFE!!!!!!

  • Victoria Lewis
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    A very caring experience. The physical therapy is fantastic. They met our needs in every way.

  • Jarrod Young
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    The facility my look nice but don't judge a book by its cover. The activities director does not care about the residents wellbeing she is also very rude and unprofessional. Cecil the owner has no concerns about his employees only importance to him is selfimage. Which cause the employees to be very unhappy that cause lack of care to the residents. Think twice before you send your family member here. "Everything that looks nice may not always be good for you.."

  • Gloria Thomas
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This is a facility that I was very unhappy with. My sister was recently admitted to the facility after hospitalization and it seems as though the only thing the facility was concerned about was receiving the highest Medicare reimbursement rate and not quality care for my sister. My sister was discharged from the facility on day 21 after admission and was sent home without any follow up care which required hospitalization within 24 hours of discharge. I do not feel that her medical needs were being monitored. I am also concerned with how this facility went from a 5 star facility to a 2 star facility within a 2 year time frame. Staff need to be more attentive.

About Tuscany Village

General Information

Legal Business NameLinbar Enterprises LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 4, 2008 (11 years)
Capacity132
Residents116
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Tuscany Village

Tuscany Village was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 22, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

July 5, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintProtect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

November 5, 2015 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$3,900 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Tuscany Village require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 10min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 50min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.3%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
92.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
45.5%
77.3%
-
-
49.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.0%
17.7%
16.1%
15.1%
25.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.7%
20.4%
9.1%
21.9%
20.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.4%
9.4%
8.2%
12.9%
16.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
18.6%
8.3%
13.0%
5.8%
18.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.2%
6.2%
4.8%
7.9%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
11.3%
14.3%
12.7%
7.3%
6.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.7%
0.0%
1.7%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.6%
3.3%
4.9%
1.6%
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.2%
3.1%
9.7%
7.9%
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.1%
4.6%
4.8%
3.2%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
1.6%
3.5%
3.3%
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

86.6%
94.9%
95.2%
89.5%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.9%
93.4%
93.4%
93.4%
75.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.2%
54.8%
53.9%
56.2%
60.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
2.8%
3.2%
3.5%
4.7%
11.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.3%
1.2%
3.4%
4.0%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
1.6%
2.4%
1.3%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places