Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Oak Park Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. San Antonio
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.2 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Great place. Great staff. They recently renovated a majority of the building and two patios. Looks great. Also just added an awesome memory care wing.

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    THIS PLACE IS THE WORST!!!!! in S.A. i'm a patient and l have to struggle almost every day to get help . l have to wait close to an hour to get help from a C.N.A or a Nurse when i'm in pain nurses Take for ever..i can hear other patients yelling for help and the C.N.A they can barely go to a room because they're so busy helping one patient. A C.N.A told me that their bosses "Jorge" leave only one C.N.A on the floor to take Care of 13 patients!!! No wonder i don't get my showers on my shower day.and its not the nurses or C.N.A fault It really is the staffing! They really don't care about patients or their employees. I have seen a C.N.A cry 3 times she runs like crazy to try to help 13 patients! I have talked to supervisors and everything continues the same they don't fix the patient care means they don't care don't bring your loving ones here the phisical therapy isn't good either! ALSO!!! The food here is worst than the care! Jail food is probably better! Somebody call the state to check this place.

  • ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Because more than often you get one egg and a toast for breakfast instead of what's on the menu and then have them say it's a culinary masterpiece lol I wish that was my only complaint was the food lmao

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    The facility has had a recent update and looks amazing. The staff are excellent and results driven. The team there are experts in Short Term Stays and able to get patients back home within a short amount of time. Highly recommend you see in person. They are not the newest in the area but their staff surpasses the others!

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    My father was there for only hours and the nurses almost killed him. Then once the ambulance came the nurses refused to provide their names. These "nurses" are in no way trained and are not compassionate human beings( to say lightly).

About Oak Park Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

General Information

Legal Business NamePinnacle Health Facilities Xx Lp
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareDecember 8, 1988 (29 years)
Capacity170
Residents95
Percent Occupied56%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Oak Park Nursing And Rehabilitation Center

Oak Park Nursing And Rehabilitation Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 7, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.

December 4, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.

November 5, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

May 21, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Oak Park Nursing And Rehabilitation Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 30min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 30min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

99.0%
89.1%
89.1%
89.1%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
89.4%
97.6%
97.7%
95.2%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
57.9%
52.3%
50.0%
52.6%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
25.4%
27.4%
21.0%
25.8%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
22.7%
23.3%
23.7%
15.9%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
19.7%
18.1%
17.4%
19.4%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
11.3%
12.3%
19.0%
17.2%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
22.9%
8.8%
14.6%
11.2%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.9%
7.6%
8.5%
2.5%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
1.7%
3.1%
3.4%
3.2%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
8.3%
4.0%
3.9%
2.7%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
2.4%
3.4%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.2%
2.4%
1.1%
1.2%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
8.8%
3.8%
5.4%
3.1%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

64.0%
62.9%
60.7%
62.4%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.8%
56.3%
56.3%
56.3%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
59.5%
61.5%
53.6%
48.8%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
28.7%
26.4%
19.0%
13.5%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.4%
1.2%
1.4%
3.1%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.7%
0.8%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places