Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Powerback Rehabilitation San Antonio

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. San Antonio
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Powerback Rehabilitation San Antonio

General Information

Legal Business Name5423 Hamilton Wolfe Road Operations LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 25, 2009 (8 years)
Capacity90
Residents54
Percent Occupied60%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Powerback Rehabilitation San Antonio

Powerback Rehabilitation San Antonio
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 22, 2016 - 6 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

February 4, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionHave enough outside ventilation via a window or mechanical ventilation, or both.

February 19, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Powerback Rehabilitation San Antonio require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 40min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
2hr 5min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
1hr 35min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 60min
4hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 3hr 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

75.6%
77.7%
89.0%
89.4%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
81.3%
79.2%
79.2%
79.2%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
30.9%
50.2%
55.7%
56.2%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
54.1%
46.5%
37.5%
33.8%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.2%
0.4%
0.2%
0.4%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.6%
1.5%
0.8%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened