Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Homestead Of Sherman

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Sherman
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.6 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Cheryl McRee
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Pleased to say I've worked here for 10yrs this June and love what I do and the people I work with. I've been blessed to have all 3 of my grandparents here and many of my church family. Our facility is clean and smells nice when you walk in, the remodeling that was done has made a soothing touch to the eyes with beautiful colors. Our care is excellent and we treat our residents as we would our own family. I love meeting new people and enjoy the families that come through here with their loved ones.

  • Jaycie Polenske
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    We have awesome team work!! And get along with our residents!! Good place to be!! Come join our family because we'll make you feel at home!!

  • Nikki Parker
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    Don't bring your loved ones here unless you want them to die! The staff here does not take proper care of the residents. My grandmother almost died because of their neglect!

  • Ann Bailey
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Excellent therapy...... that is all you can say!!!! Food is horrible- place is filthy - many aides have an attitude and are related to other staff members...... VERY POOR SITUATION!

  • Rebecca Lichnovsky
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    To aggravate to even explain

About The Homestead Of Sherman

General Information

Legal Business NameJ-S Sherman Operations Lp
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 2, 2006 (11 years)
Capacity132
Residents96
Percent Occupied73%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Homestead Of Sherman

The Homestead Of Sherman
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 7, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

December 18, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.

September 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$85,930 fine
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 25 days
LManyImmediate JeopardyComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
LManyImmediate JeopardyComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
LManyImmediate JeopardyComplaintProtect each resident from mistreatment, neglect and misappropriation of personal property.
LManyImmediate JeopardyComplaintImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Homestead Of Sherman require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

35min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
2hr 5min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

98.8%
95.5%
95.5%
95.5%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
97.7%
97.5%
98.7%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
46.4%
31.8%
27.3%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
34.4%
35.9%
28.3%
30.0%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.1%
17.1%
15.1%
22.2%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.9%
10.8%
10.5%
11.0%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
38.6%
10.7%
18.9%
12.2%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.2%
5.2%
5.5%
6.5%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
5.8%
6.4%
3.9%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.8%
7.9%
8.1%
7.6%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.3%
1.2%
1.3%
1.4%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
9.9%
2.3%
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.6%
5.7%
5.1%
7.9%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.3%
1.7%
2.3%
1.8%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

93.0%
88.0%
90.2%
89.5%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.8%
87.1%
87.1%
87.1%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
58.1%
63.4%
56.7%
57.6%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
6.8%
9.8%
15.8%
11.7%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.7%
2.1%
0.0%
1.0%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
1.0%
1.0%
0.9%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places