Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Village At Gleannloch Farms

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Texas
  3. Spring Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Karen Loza
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Do NOT send your loved ones here. We were promised 15 minute response time to the call button in skilled nursing and so far the fastest response time is 40 minutes. They encourage patients to soil themselves because they refuse to help them to the toilet. Then patients sit/lay in their 'mess' for hours. We were obviously misled by Sheldon when he gave the tour. I'm not sure how this facility received a high rating. Very understaffed!

  • Lyndsay Arold
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Beautiful Community with wonderful residents and staff!

  • Carolyn Vandermeer
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The Village at Gleannloch Farms is a lovely place to live! I found it by accident - looking for rehab for my husband. Nicole from A Place for Mom told me that I should check out The Village at Gleannloch Farms. I was greeted by a lovely, caring person named Larissa. I was given a tour of the facility by Todd and I fell in love with it. As I took my tour I met many happy, kind residents - many who have lived here since it opened ten years ago. Two weeks later I was working with two more incredible staff members, Ken and then Karen, signing the papers for an apartment in independent living! Each staff member cares about the residents and will do whatever he or she can do to make living here pleasant and stress-free. I have a sense of peace living here that I have never had before. Whatever happens healthwise, I can live at Gleannloch - in Independent Living, Assisted Living, Memory Care or Skilled nursing - all under one roof. They also have beautiful independent living cottages! The food is delicious! The dining room is beautiful and inviting. All of the residents know and support each other. If you are looking for a retirement community for yourself or your parents, at least pay a visit to Geannloch. I went through this search years ago for my father-in-law and then my mother, and then more recently for my husband and myself. I can honestly say that the Village at Gleannloch Farms stands head and shoulders above any that I have ever seen.

  • Courtney Guerin
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    My grandfather has been living here for 4 years and has loved it. This year he had a stroke. He's been living in the same building but they have a separate wing for those who need a little more assistance. I don't have anything to complain about so far but things are still new here for us

  • Michaela Walker-Hettinger
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Beautiful community

About The Village At Gleannloch Farms

General Information

Legal Business NameCcrc Opco Gleannloch Farms LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 8, 2009 (11 years)
Capacity35
Residents34
Percent Occupied97%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Village At Gleannloch Farms

The Village At Gleannloch Farms was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

February 22, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.

January 6, 2016 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,268 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Village At Gleannloch Farms require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 40min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 35min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
93.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
92.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
49.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
25.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
20.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
16.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
18.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
6.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
4.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
3.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
3.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
1.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

77.0%
82.5%
85.4%
91.3%
78.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
46.6%
77.2%
76.2%
76.2%
75.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
71.4%
74.7%
62.8%
58.6%
60.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
14.3%
7.7%
11.2%
11.2%
11.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.5%
1.7%
2.4%
2.4%
2.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places