Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Sweeny House

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Sweeny
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Administration here FAILS at patient advocacy horribly! When the medicare insurance company calls your elderly parent and tells them how badly the facility failed you by KICKING YOU OUT on Christmas Day to an unequipped house when she can barely stand on her own, once standing can only walk 3 to 4 steps, can not lift herself off the toilet, off the bed without assistance .... you know there's a very bad issue. The Social Worker Carrie, refused and tried to talk us out of filing the Q.I.O. Appeal multiple times until It was to late for the appeal. And then refused to even help the patient through the appeal process, literally handed my elderly disabled mom a piece of paper and walked out of the room, She can't even see the numbers on her small flip phone, one of the nursing staff came in and dialed the number for her after mom asked them. The appeal was literally 3 hours too late ( it should have been filed 3 days before when notice was first given but administration told my parents that it wasn't something that was plausible basically the appeal would be a waste of time and money for them... Appeals are Free FYI) . We really wished we knew WHY Carrie decided not to do her job as a Social worker for HER patients and FIle the widely known fast BFCC-QIO APPEAL that would have kept my Mom in a Nursing rehab Facility instead of putting her health in more danger, and risk of losing all the work from rehabilitation from the last 30 days by sending her home with no Wheelchair, no hospital bed, no nursing staff, no home health agency even set up. if you have a choice in healthcare DO NOT PUT YOUR LOVED ONES AT RISK WITH THE ADMINSTRATION AT SWEENY HOUSE. I feel bad for the most of the nursing staff having to work under this poor of administration! You can be Nice and polite and still be horrible at your job.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Enjoyed working with the residents, taking care of the elderly really made me feel good about myself. Who knows, one day it could be me and someone has to take care of me.

  • ★★★★★ 6 years ago

    Awful patient care & the administrator Sandra pecot is rude

About Sweeny House

General Information

Legal Business NameSsc Sweeny Operating Company LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 31, 1994 (24 years)
Capacity90
Residents71
Percent Occupied79%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Sweeny House

Sweeny House
was reviewed by to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 9, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

January 22, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

August 7, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a post-discharge plan with the resident and family for the resident's care after leaving the nursing home.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide proper discharge planning and communication, of the resident's health status and summary of the resident's nursing home stay.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Sweeny House require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 45min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
20min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 40min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

75.0%
87.3%
87.3%
87.3%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.4%
55.3%
66.7%
78.1%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
73.3%
55.9%
70.0%
68.0%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.8%
27.8%
31.2%
28.3%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
19.9%
13.6%
24.5%
26.9%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
11.3%
10.7%
10.2%
9.1%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
16.9%
17.9%
26.2%
25.0%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.4%
3.2%
1.9%
0.0%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.3%
16.0%
14.7%
15.6%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.8%
8.2%
13.0%
8.7%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
25.4%
7.4%
6.2%
4.9%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.8%
0.0%
2.9%
1.6%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.2%
3.9%
1.4%
3.1%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.2%
1.0%
1.1%
1.4%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
4.2%
3.9%
2.9%
1.6%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

40.6%
22.2%
38.1%
40.7%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
11.5%
40.7%
40.7%
40.7%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
13.3%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
10.0%
-
-
7.4%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
6.5%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places