Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Country View Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Terrell
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    PROS: The facility is always clean and doesn't smell like a stereotypical nursing facility. The food is always served hot, on time and in very good proportions. The activities coordinator is extremely personable and very interactive with the residents. The facility isn't fancy. It's old, but is clean. The rooms were kept tidy, the trash was taken out regularly and bathrooms (although very small & outdated) were for the most part always clean. The rooms, although sort of drearily painted, are spacious with plenty of drawer space & each room is supplied with a good sized TV set for those who are able to enjoy watching a little TV. Cabinet space is also plentiful. Closet space is ample. Some of the CNA's really work hard and treat the patients with love & care. The kitchen staff was pleasant and accommodating. Most of the weekday nurses were knowledgeable, pleasant and hard-working providing attentive care to the residents. CONS: The Director of Nurses at this facility is difficult to work with. We encountered multiple issues with her because we stayed very actively involved in our mother's care. We had a lot of years with Mother's care in the home prior to placing her in the facility. The Administrator, after several meetings involving his staff, the VITAS team and my sister and I, did not take appropriate measures to correct his D.O.N. although we do believe he addressed some issues with one particular DNA who was a little snippety with us in the beginning. She eventually changed her attitude, but in reality, we really never knew from one day to the next whether she would be defensive or cooperative with us. Clearly, the D.O.N. runs the show here. The weekend nurse was very difficult to deal with. It was virtually impossible to have a conversation with her because she would talk "at" you and not "with" you. She lacked communication skills any sort of compassion and also found it extremely difficult to listen to input from our family. She was downright rude and condescending multiple times. She simply couldn't handle being questioned. The facility is understaffed. It was very, very infrequent that a CNA was available to come to Mother's room to feed her when she wasn't up for getting into her wheelchair to be fed in the dining room. The night time crew is VERY bare bones, and the times we were up there during late hours, we didn't notice them walking halls checking in on patients very often.There was no way a nurse positioned at the Nurses Station was able to hear our mother if she was crying or having anxiety, and on more than a few occasions, Mother would've suffered hours of anxiety had my sister or I not been present. After 6 weeks of battling with the Administrator, D.O.N and weekend nurse, we made the decision to take our mother out of this facility. She is a new person at home with us. The nursing home just couldn't seem to ever quite grasp that the objective was to provide Mother with palliative care as her disease is terminal and her diagnosis was that she had less than 6 months to live.We were basically accused of wanting our mother to be sedated 24/7 and not caring whether our mother actually ate her meals. I suppose if you are a family that just needs to drop your loved one off and leave them somewhere to be fed, changed and administered medications on time, this place might be okay with you. It wasn't a good fit for us because the heads of the departments involved in our mother's care simply weren't willing to work with our hospice team and us to provide optimal care for our mother.

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

About Country View Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp

General Information

Legal Business NameCountry View Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 25, 1993 (25 years)
Capacity115
Residents38
Percent Occupied33%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Country View Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp

Country View Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp
was reviewed by to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 14, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

July 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Country View Nursing And Rehabilitation Lp require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.5%
91.2%
91.2%
91.2%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9%
90.6%
93.8%
86.5%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.0%
42.3%
46.2%
32.4%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.4%
5.4%
12.9%
20.8%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
32.1%
32.1%
28.6%
21.2%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
17.4%
-
21.7%
21.4%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
0.0%
0.0%
4.3%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
6.2%
14.3%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
2.9%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
6.2%
6.2%
0.0%
8.3%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
6.2%
3.1%
0.0%
2.7%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

-
-
62.1%
80.0%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
3.7%
4.9%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places