Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

College Park Rehabilitation And Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Weatherford
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    5+ years ago this was a great place, however, the change in ownership/management has brought negative changes to the facility. Quantity over quality is reflected in their day to day operations. Very disappointed in the lack of sensitivity and compassion by management in regards to the treatment of my father during his last days before he passed away.

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    The nurses are wonderful.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Its wonderful and amazing place to be always. , what do you want to talk about.the cna staffs they are wonderful and great, also all the residents are doing well its a good place to be.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    The staff was wonderful. The administration not so much.

  • ★★★★★ 6 years ago

    I HIGHLY RECOMMEND THIS HOME. This home is the best in the area. Its clean, the staff is caring and the Admin. office is allways open. My mother and mother-in-law have both been residents there and were rehabed back home.

About College Park Rehabilitation And Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameParker County Hospital District
Ownership TypeGovernment - Hospital District
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 26, 2009 (9 years)
Capacity120
Residents112
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for College Park Rehabilitation And Care Center

College Park Rehabilitation And Care Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 23, 2016 - 14 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

October 30, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide food in a way that meets a resident's needs.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of College Park Rehabilitation And Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 45min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 10min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

85.2%
98.8%
98.8%
98.8%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
98.7%
98.7%
100.0%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
48.9%
39.5%
42.1%
33.3%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.4%
41.2%
41.6%
45.0%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
15.0%
5.7%
9.1%
22.3%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
31.2%
30.1%
20.3%
20.7%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.9%
9.2%
23.6%
10.7%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.7%
10.9%
6.8%
3.9%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5%
3.8%
8.0%
9.2%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.5%
8.3%
13.0%
11.1%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.9%
5.6%
5.2%
12.3%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.5%
0.0%
4.0%
4.6%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.9%
6.3%
10.1%
8.0%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.2%
3.7%
0.0%
1.2%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
93.3%
94.2%
98.8%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.5%
90.8%
90.8%
90.8%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.1%
59.3%
65.2%
70.1%
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
33.3%
23.3%
19.5%
22.0%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.0%
2.8%
1.0%
1.7%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
2.6%
3.2%
3.7%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places