Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Deer Creek Of Wimberley

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Texas (TX)
  4. Wimberley
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    When I was visited in the hospital by the marketing woman who draws this absolutly wondrful picturest setting out in the kountry and away from the city life, it sounded like a dream resort and a piece of naturalistic heaven. ,But believe me this place is horrific from day 1. Several times I ate my meals sitting in my own feces. I even had to wait several times for 3 or 4 hours to get cleaned up. The nurses aides are over worked, under paid and try to do the best they can. 6 out of 10 of the nurses aides gave myself wonderful care the other 4 were noncaring and would walk by a call light multiple times before answering it. The nurses again for the most part are prompt and courteous.Do not expect them to do much more than pass meds or do blood sugar tests because only a few of the nurses will answer a call light and then they will tell the nurses aides to do it no matter how busey the aides are. Management is a absolute joke and a poor joke at that. The administrator M.J. And the Director of Nursing ROY, ARE POOR EXCUSES FOR HUMAN BEINGS. The D.O.N. Roy is supposed to be an ex-marine, well of all my years working as a nurse I never met a marine that was about as useless as teets on a bull. He makes his mind up by reading reports instead of looking into the facts and asking questions. They will say at Deer Creek,"if you have any problems let them know". What they are really saying is, keep quiet, fly under their radar and we won't transfer you to some facility far away from driends and family. My advice from a residents point of view is pretty clear... STAY AS FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE from this place. If you do need help and want to complain to the ombudsman thinking they will help? Forget it! All they do is come by 5-7 days after you contact them and then all the ombudsman will do is pacify you appear to be caring whenin reality they would not lift a finger. This inustry is corrupt, no wonder nursing homes in Texas overall got an F rating by the Federal gov. P.S. The food is not bad tasting just make sure you get your food early before they run out. Also do not waste your time making out a list of food dislikes because the only thing that will happen to it is it will get used to light the pilot light on the gas cooking equipment, none of them can read.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Complete lack of concern for the patients needs. Constantly making promises to the patient and the family and days later they always had an excuse as to why they could not follow through. Building and rooms are in bad condition, the staff is spread too thin and their lack of solid, trustworthy owners has turned this place in to a dark, depressing, feces and urine smelling facility. Thank God my father lived through it, BUT, he may never recover from the rude and overly forceful PT staff. I will drive 100 miles to place him in a 5 star facility before I EVER consider that SH!$ Hole. It is blatently obvious the owners are pocketing the money and not spending a dime to keep our loved ones comfortable. I met a patients wife at the facility on the day she was transferring him because she worked at Deer Creek years before. She said it was a fabulous place when the original owners were in place. Soon as it sold the new owners cut the staff and budgets and salaries to the point the staff cannot cover their patient load. Most are indiffereny anyway because they are paid so poorly. I went to visit my father 2 days before he was to be discharged and he was dressed in womens clothes. The could not find his clothes!

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    My mother stayed their and I visited everyday. She was their under Hospice respite care because she was dying. Deer Creek did not help her to die peacefully in spite of my wishes with her Medical Power of Attorney giving me 100% in charge of her directives. After 7 days, in which Medicare paid for her respite care and then after that they charged $192.00 a day. I had to give them a check for $5,760,00 on the 9th of November for 30 days in advance. I told them she will probably die before the 30 days were up and they told me they would give me a refund of days not spent there. Everyday they kept her alive they got $192.00. I believe that is a conflict of interest in spite of my directives. She died at 4:54 AM on the 20th of November and I have yet to receive a refund. I have been there 3 times and they claim the check has to come from their corporate headquarters. Today is the 8th of January 2016 and I still have no refund check. You figure out where their real interest is.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

About Deer Creek Of Wimberley

General Information

Legal Business NameUvalde County Hospital Authority
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Individual
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 7, 1991 (27 years)
Capacity122
Residents74
Percent Occupied61%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Deer Creek Of Wimberley

Deer Creek Of Wimberley
was reviewed by to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Texas Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 9, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

October 16, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that nurse aides show they have the skills and techniques to be able to care for residents' needs.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionProvide written records when a resident is transferred or discharged.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Deer Creek Of Wimberley require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
98.7%
98.7%
89.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
41.7%
50.0%
38.9%
42.9%
48.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.3%
25.0%
29.4%
25.4%
27.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.8%
7.2%
21.6%
21.7%
20.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
23.5%
26.4%
28.4%
28.6%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.3%
20.6%
15.4%
12.5%
19.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.3%
3.9%
9.6%
10.9%
7.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
9.6%
9.7%
13.2%
9.3%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.5%
4.2%
5.7%
10.0%
6.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
12.8%
5.4%
5.2%
1.4%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6%
1.4%
5.3%
4.0%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
6.8%
3.9%
6.7%
3.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.3%
2.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.2%
2.7%
1.3%
1.3%
0.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.5%
98.7%
97.0%
87.5%
74.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
79.7%
86.7%
86.7%
86.7%
71.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
73.8%
66.3%
59.1%
-
55.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
28.3%
14.8%
6.8%
9.4%
14.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.8%
3.8%
2.2%
4.3%
3.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.3%
2.1%
2.2%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016TX
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places