Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Avalon Care Center-Bountiful

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Utah (UT)
  4. Bountiful
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Joseph Bennette
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    We noticed a warm atmosphere of residents and caring staff who greeted us kindly and immediately directed us to our mother's room. We found the room spacious and well lit with a large window overlooking colorful flowers just outside. Mom appeared well and healthy. Her environment was odorless as was she - a sign that staff has done their job well in seeing to Mom's hygiene. As we were leaving a harpist entered the room with harp. Brilliant! Our only gripe (and a tiny one at that) is with the small number of staff we saw. Still, the staff seems to be doing a good job because the place smells good (basically odorless) and residents seem to be happy and interactive with other residents and staff in the home. We can't speak to activities, medical care, or dining because we were only there for about 30 minutes.

  • Julie Landeck
    ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    This place was the worst experience I've ever had. I came into the facility after having suffered 4 cardiac arrests , learning I was born with a heart defect and had a pacemaker / defibrillator implanted also contracted bacterimia. Which is a blood Infection that goes to the heart so I had to be on iv antibiotics which required a consistent regimen. There was anything but consistency here. Being in pain one early morning before the sun came up and having some heart palpitations I could not find any staff. I walked this facility for 35 minutes and could not find one staff member. We also would be locked in the facility with no means to escape should a fire or emergency break out. Until this place fixes these problems with staff and follow the rules I would not recommend care here for anyone.

  • Brian Clayden
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    A welcoming facility with very nice staff.

  • Debbie Best
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    When a client was turning red and having problems breathing they refused to send the client to the hospital until they contacted both gardia ns. this client did not have a DNR and one of the guardians said please send them to the hospital! they ignored this plea until the other guardian was contacted. This is the worst facility I've ever witnessed.

  • Katie Smith
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    The aids don't care whether they get the residents taken care of, housekeeping does a horrible job of cleaning. The place is a scummy mess. There's not nearly nurses of take care of all the residents. If I could give this a 0 stars ATI get I would. Do not take your loved ones here if you want them to be clean, happy, and well taken care of.

About Avalon Care Center-Bountiful

General Information

Legal Business NameBountiful Care Center, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJuly 16, 2004 (14 years)
Capacity122
Residents63
Percent Occupied52%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Avalon Care Center-Bountiful

Avalon Care Center-Bountiful was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Utah Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 3, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$3,031 fine
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Avalon Care Center-Bountiful require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
15min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 45min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
97.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
55.0%
56.0%
57.1%
55.0%
49.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.6%
24.0%
25.0%
17.9%
30.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
6.9%
8.2%
10.6%
4.4%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
10.2%
17.6%
18.6%
16.7%
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
6.7%
6.2%
13.2%
15.4%
12.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.8%
17.6%
15.8%
12.6%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1%
2.5%
0.0%
3.3%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.4%
1.9%
4.3%
2.3%
9.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.0%
1.9%
0.0%
2.2%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.9%
3.7%
4.3%
2.2%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.8%
0.0%
2.2%
4.3%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
90.7%
98.2%
98.2%
98.2%
88.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
63.5%
76.3%
66.7%
62.8%
60.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
15.6%
13.8%
24.0%
33.3%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.1%
3.0%
1.4%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places