Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rocky Mountain Care - Clearfield

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Utah (UT)
  4. Clearfield
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Rocky Mountain Care - Clearfield

General Information

Legal Business NameBeaver Valley Hospital
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 2, 1981 (36 years)
Capacity168
Residents125
Percent Occupied74%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rocky Mountain Care - Clearfield

Rocky Mountain Care - Clearfield
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Utah Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 8, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,495 fine
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionSet up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies quarterly, and develop corrective plans of action.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+Inspection1) Provide 3 meals at regular times; 2) serve breakfast within 14 hours of dinner; and 3) offer a snack at bedtime each day.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMake sure that residents receive treatments/services to maintain or improve their ability to care for themselves.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionHire sufficient dietary support personnel.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAssure that each residentís assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.

February 24, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

April 15, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

November 5, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rocky Mountain Care - Clearfield require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 10min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
45min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 10min
4hr 50min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 20min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
77.8%
77.8%
77.8%
93.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.8%
89.9%
94.4%
95.9%
97.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
63.3%
68.2%
55.8%
56.5%
49.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
33.8%
41.9%
37.9%
32.4%
30.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
23.2%
25.8%
17.1%
21.4%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
13.8%
17.2%
15.1%
17.2%
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.5%
15.7%
20.6%
15.5%
12.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
23.2%
7.5%
1.1%
0.0%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.4%
7.9%
6.7%
1.0%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.6%
7.1%
4.9%
2.4%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
2.1%
3.4%
1.1%
2.0%
9.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.2%
7.9%
5.6%
7.2%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.2%
4.5%
1.1%
2.0%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
6.8%
6.8%
9.4%
4.8%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

89.5%
88.1%
91.5%
92.8%
91.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
97.8%
84.0%
84.0%
84.0%
88.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
57.1%
55.4%
49.5%
51.1%
60.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
25.3%
14.0%
9.0%
6.6%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5%
2.2%
2.7%
1.7%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
0.6%
0.3%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened