Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Thatcher Brook Rehabilitation & Care

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Utah (UT)
  4. Clearfield
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    This is the 3rd time my mother has been here. She receives quality care while she's here which is why she chooses this care center over any others. The therapy is wonderful and helps her in so many ways. She is always thrilled to do whatever they ask of her because she knows it is for her best interests. The nurses and staff are compassionate and hard working and the chef does a remarkable job. The food is always well rounded healthy food, which also helps her heal.

  • ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    My recent visit to Thatcher Brook was wonderful. I left the hospital with a lot of pain after major back surgery. The entire staff was excellent. The facility was very clean and the art work was amazing. The meals were prepared very well. I'm a picky eater so the chef came and visited with me for ten to fifteen minutes. We discussed how he could work with me on meal selection. He was a very nice man. The therapists, Toby and Sarah were awesome. They had me walking right away.They were awesome!

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My wifes grandpa stayed here for almost a month and had the best experience. He said the food was amazing and that the care that was provided to him was exceptional. When I went in to visit him the facility was extremely nice and very clean and up to date. I would definitely recommend this facility.

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My grandpa stayed here just recently and had a really great experience. His therapy went great and the nurses and CNA's were always there willing to help. I would definitely recommend Thatcher Brook to anyone looking for a great rehab and care center.

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I stayed here for 2 months. The CNAs and other nurses were average or decent. Mindy was really bad though, I hear she no longer works there. Food wasn't the greatest, but the milk was good. I really liked the fact that I had OT and PT every day, they did a really good job working with me, I had Ryan and Tyler. They were great.

About Thatcher Brook Rehabilitation & Care

General Information

Legal Business NameThatcher Brook Rehabilitation And Care Center LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 16, 2009 (9 years)
Capacity30
Residents24
Percent Occupied80%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Thatcher Brook Rehabilitation & Care

Thatcher Brook Rehabilitation & Care
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Utah Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 18, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Thatcher Brook Rehabilitation & Care require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 40min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
55min
ReportedExpected
LPN
2hr 10min
1hr 55min
ReportedExpected
RN
6hr 45min
5hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 5hr 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
93.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
97.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
49.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
30.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
12.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
9.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.0%
99.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.5%
86.6%
86.6%
86.6%
88.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
78.7%
83.0%
80.4%
72.6%
60.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
17.2%
21.5%
16.0%
7.0%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.7%
2.2%
2.1%
0.7%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.9%
0.9%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places