Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Draper Rehabilitation And Care Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Utah (UT)
  4. Draper
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Madison Gray
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My mom has been here not even a week and my impressions with the staff are not great. The night staff are always in a grumpy mood. They treat my mother like an animal that doesn't get attention and the proper care. They don't clean out the room or empty the trash cans. My family members that visit my mother say not one nurse comes to check on my mother for assistance etc. I think the last rehab facility my mother was at had better care for patients than this place. The staff was very loving and caring to their patients and was always there right away when they need something. This place is like a prison. I think your staff needs to act like they love their job and care for others or find a major that will make them happy

  • Emily Lister
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Knowledgeable nurses that are nice and attentive. Therapy team that will get you where you what to be. I love this place.

  • Ruby A
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    My husband lived in this facility for 13 days. Staff is good and helpful. Therapy team is good. Speech therapist was knowledgeable and friendly. The best nurse ever is Katrina Osorio. She is really caring and dedicated to her patients. She serves her patients with smiling face. I was not worried for my husband, when she was on duty.....And CNA Aimee and Jay Anderson were amazing too. These three people took really good care of my husband, may God bless them always.... The smell in this facility is aweful and food is horrible. I would like to suggest if your loved one is in this facility, plz visit very frequently to check on them and provide them food from home.

  • Becky Kemp
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    My mom was here for almost 1 week and that was TOO long, the rehab department was AWESOME! Everything else was not good, long wait times for assistance with bathroom, staff doesn't listen to family or patients, food tastes HORRIBLE and presentation is even worse. The only other plus we would give this place is that the long term residents who live there seem to be very kind, but i fell bad for them, they deserve better. I understand being short staffed (which they seem to be), but no excuse to not shower someone when it's been 5 days since their last shower or not noticing or caring that they didn't get a dinner tray, til i showed up almost 2 hours after trays were passed out. Ugh, maybe all facilities are this bad :( i hope not.

  • Devin Rapp
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    According to the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), facility is 5 Stars in Quality Measures and Outcomes and 5 Stars Overall! One of U.S. News and World Rankings "Best Nursing Homes in Utah" in 2015. Draper Rehab has great people, who care about the people and know the residents and their families well. Renovated therapy gyms that have kitchen and bathroom and so that patients can practice doing tasks they'll need to do at home so that they're safe when they go home.

About Draper Rehabilitation And Care Center

General Information

Legal Business NameBeaver Valley Hospital
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsYes
First Accepted MedicareSeptember 1, 1983 (34 years)
Capacity93
Residents54
Percent Occupied58%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Draper Rehabilitation And Care Center

Draper Rehabilitation And Care Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 4 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Utah Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Note that this facility has changed ownership within the past 12 months.

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 3, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,495 fine
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.

January 22, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Draper Rehabilitation And Care Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 50min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 20min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.7%
92.6%
92.6%
92.6%
93.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
97.9%
92.9%
97.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
75.0%
-
-
-
49.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
26.7%
24.4%
27.8%
45.5%
30.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
22.6%
15.6%
3.7%
6.8%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.5%
13.0%
14.6%
20.0%
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
13.3%
15.6%
8.1%
5.7%
12.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
8.6%
9.3%
-
-
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.9%
2.0%
0.0%
2.4%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.5%
4.3%
0.0%
2.7%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.0%
5.3%
10.5%
0.0%
9.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.9%
8.0%
0.0%
2.4%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
2.0%
4.3%
2.4%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.0%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.6%
96.0%
94.9%
95.7%
91.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
91.2%
83.2%
83.2%
83.2%
88.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.9%
74.0%
63.3%
64.1%
60.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
13.7%
10.9%
10.3%
-
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
1.7%
2.5%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places