Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Aspen Ridge Of Utah Valley

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Utah (UT)
  4. Orem
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 5.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Superb facility, dedicated staff and therapists, great dining experience, excellent care!

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I went here after total knee replacement about three years ago, the quality of care was outstanding. For me the most important part was the rehab which I found superior to anything I had seen or researched at other facilities. Now I am having another replacement and was curious if they still had same reputation as they did three years ago, I called a friend in the industry and he said he would go there over any other place in my area. By the way I went there at 44 the first time and now I am 47, maybe that will help some of you younger guys and gal (as they call me) to come to this in-care place.

  • ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    Beautiful facility! Took incredible care of my mother after broken hip surgery. Thank you!

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    I stayed there for 5 weeks and have stayed at others in the past following some major surgeries. Aspen beats them hands down. The food was great, the physical therapy was too, and the majority of the staff was excellent and very efficient and kind. The building and rooms are superior to other similar facilities. If I need care again I will most definitely go to Aspen and I highly recommend it to everyone needing a rehabilitation facility - long term or short term.

  • ★★★★★ 6 years ago

About Aspen Ridge Of Utah Valley

General Information

Legal Business NameAhc Of Orem LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 7, 2009 (8 years)
Capacity24
Residents23
Percent Occupied96%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Aspen Ridge Of Utah Valley

Aspen Ridge Of Utah Valley
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Utah Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

November 2, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionLet residents talk to and get information from agencies acting on their behalf.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

October 22, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Aspen Ridge Of Utah Valley require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 55min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
35min
45min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 35min
1hr 40min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 5min
4hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 3hr 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
93.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
97.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
49.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
30.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
12.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
9.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.5%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
91.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
95.4%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
88.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.5%
81.9%
83.7%
92.6%
60.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
6.7%
3.8%
2.8%
5.5%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places