Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Cascades At Orchard Park

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Utah (UT)
  4. Orem
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a week ago

    My grandma loved it!!! Friendly staff, fun activities, smells good and the food is great!!! Also the therapy staff is wonderful it never seems like you are a burden to the staff here. Also the gal at the front desk also has the best attitude! They really are there to take care of the patients. I highly recommend Orchard Park to any one seeking the attention they want from such a facility! You wont regret it!!!

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Orchard Park is not your average nursing home. Orchard Park is the Target of the nursing home business. If you had the wonderful opportunity to send your cute grandparents to a Target type facility, why would you send them to a Walmart, a Kmart or worse... a Shop Co? Orchard Park is your one stop shop for all your nursing home needs, but it's classy and sophisticated like the shops at City Creek. The administrator, Brent, could be described as the Ryan Gosling of administrators. Under his direction, the staff provide excellent care and maintain the building's 5-star status. I am personally sad that I am not 80, because I want to live here. I would recommend Orchard Park to anyone and everyone.

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    It is a very bright, cheerful, happy environment. The staff doesn't just take care of the residents because it's their job, they do it because they truly love the people they are caring for. Also they provide a lot of fun and creative activities for the residents, and lots of variety. It is a wonderful place, and I would recommend family and friends to go to Orchard Park if they need rehab or long term care!

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    I have worked with Orchard Park over the last ten years with transitioning their patients home with home health and hospice. They are an excellent facility for both short term rehab and long term care. Their team is skilled and compassionate and you can sense right away they love what they do and truly care about their residents! I will continue to refer my friends and family as well as our patients to stay at Orchard Park. Thanks for all that you do for our community!

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    WOW this place is incredible - the feeling you get walking in feels so peaceful - it is a bit older in decor, but very clean and charming. The staff are so caring about each patient and each other, almost like they are all family. The rooms are so big and don't feel like little prison cells like most other facilities around. The therapy team has been so incredible - I wouldn't place a loved one anywhere else!!!!

About Cascades At Orchard Park

General Information

Legal Business NameCrown Health Care Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsYes
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 1, 1982 (36 years)
Capacity89
Residents43
Percent Occupied48%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Cascades At Orchard Park

Cascades At Orchard Park
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Utah Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Note that this facility has changed ownership within the past 12 months.

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 8, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents have the right to have a choice over activities, their schedules, and health care according to their interests, assessments, and plans of care.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionQuickly tell the resident's doctor the results of laboratory tests.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide written records when a resident is transferred or discharged.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionOffer other nutritional food to each resident who will not eat the food served.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.

March 4, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$2,312 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Cascades At Orchard Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 55min
2hr 30min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 40min
1hr 20min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 30min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.8%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
93.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
97.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
49.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
15.0%
4.8%
16.0%
18.5%
30.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
14.3%
23.2%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
4.5%
0.0%
8.3%
8.0%
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
4.3%
15.4%
12.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.3%
3.2%
5.4%
2.9%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.3%
0.0%
0.0%
3.8%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
9.1%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
4.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
4.3%
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.3%
4.5%
3.8%
3.6%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.4%
99.1%
95.3%
97.0%
91.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.1%
96.5%
96.5%
96.5%
88.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
84.6%
83.6%
87.9%
94.8%
60.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.4%
6.0%
4.4%
6.2%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.5%
2.9%
2.9%
3.1%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places