Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Stonehenge Of Orem

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Utah (UT)
  4. Orem
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    Stayed for a month following TKR and received excellent care, especially from the Hawaiian night shift nurses. Plus my occupational therapist Jim was so attentive, friendly, encouraging, and built up my confidence that I could do much to improve my movement and control of my left side, hand and fingers. And the center was so gracious in providing a bed for my daughter who stayed with me the whole time. It's a beautiful place, but the people there are what makes Stonehenge special.

  • ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    My wife spent 21 days at Stonehenge of Orem after a month in the hospital with folicular lymphoma. The facilities were the cleanest I have ever seen, and the staff made the word 'outstanding' seem insignificant. They truly were the best of the best. I could go on and on about the staff, but I'll spare the details and just say this: If I ever have to be in a care facility, I hope it is a Stonehenge facility. Period!

  • ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    Stonehenge of Orem is absolutely the best place on this earth, and it is a place of learning, getting healthy, and the food there is so good, all of the nursing people there are wonderful, very very professional, and the physical therapy department isThe best anywhere! I loved my three month stay there -month stay there!

  • ★★★★★ in the last week

    My father in law had a great recovery experience at Stonehenge in Orem. He made many wonderful friends during his time there and he appreciated the thoughtful service they provided. Nani was a favorite for sure. ?

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    Stonehenge is the absolute best! From the facility to the staff I truly could not have asked for a better place to go after my accident. No person my age wants to be placed in a rehabilitation center however after I fell 60 feet I did not have much choice. I am so beyond happy that I was placed in Stonehenge. The nurses ensured I had all my medication and helped me with my wounds so they did not get infected, the cnas became some of my best friends and even made my chocolate milk ever night! The kitchen staff was extremely accommodating and worked with me on what I wanted to eat for every meal which was great! I loved the PT and OT therapy so much I practilly spent all my time in the PT room! I learned to do a lot in my wheelchair and on my own as well as gained a lot of confidence back that I lost when I fell. The staff was overall so nice, welcoming, happy fun staff you could meet. I go back to visit to this day because of how great everyone at Stonehenge made my stay there.! If your loved one needs to go to a rehabilitation facility I recommend you try and get them in Stonehenge! Wish I could rate it more stars! Thanks Stonehenge staff for all you do!

About Stonehenge Of Orem

General Information

Legal Business NameStonehenge Of Orem, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 12, 2009 (9 years)
Capacity36
Residents30
Percent Occupied83%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Stonehenge Of Orem

Stonehenge Of Orem
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Utah Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 23, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPermit residents to remain in the facility and not be transferred or discharged without adequate reason.

May 12, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Stonehenge Of Orem require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 25min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 30min
1hr 35min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 40min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
93.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
97.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
49.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
30.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
12.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
9.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

99.2%
99.3%
99.2%
99.2%
91.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
99.2%
95.5%
95.5%
95.5%
88.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
51.8%
43.7%
52.0%
62.4%
60.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
48.5%
42.4%
35.8%
36.6%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.4%
0.4%
1.2%
0.8%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places