Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Meadow Brook Rehabilitation And Nursing

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Utah
  3. Salt Lake City Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Angie Chapman
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Thank you Meadowbrook, for taking such good care of my dad. He was happy, comfortable, and well cared for until the end. The amount of compassion not only for my dad, but his family was beyond any of our expectations, and you impacted every one of us positively. Sarah, Bryce, and Brittany, you are angels. ?

  • Suzie Rawlings
    ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    My dad recently had a visit to the ICU and was released to Meadowbrook Rehab and Nursing, which was a different care center than he was in before. He needed some rehabilitation and extra care that wasn't possible with his previous home. It was hard for my dad to adjust with some additional health issues. The hospital visit had left him very weak, and unable to walk. After his stay began at Meadowbrook, he was able to stand and move from his wheelchair and into a chair in the kitchen and also his recliner. He was a lot happier when he was able to do this. The staff there offered regular therapy, as well as making a special schedule with me with my dad's help to find what would work the best for him. He liked things a certain way, and they were willing to accommodate that as well as possible. The CNA staff, specifically Sarah was so kind to my dad. She worked with my dad every day and took excellent care of him. Bryce who is in charge of maintenance took my dad places in the van and got to know my dad. My dad talked about this with me. Brittany was the new administrator at Meadowbrook when we brought my dad there, and was instrumental in getting him there. She had worked with him before, and knew how special he was. She made sure things were the way he wanted in his room. Together with the rest of the staff there, which we noticed right away was kind and caring to my dad, they made his stay there during the last days of his life the best that it could be in the circumstances he was experiencing with his health. We are so sad to have lost my dad, but I will always remember the day we lost him. The effort they put forth to make sure he was taken care of up to the last minute he was there. And also the kindness they showed our family. We even took a picture with them that day. We were touched by their efforts. In a very difficult time for us, they made this a bit easier knowing that he was well taken care of. Thank you Brittany, Sarah, and Bryce for making sure he felt welcomed and loved there.

  • Lisa Dowling
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    This place is really awful. There are some good nursing staff there and I hope they get out of this awful place. The administration and social worker are some of the worst people I have worked with. I was trying to move my dad closer to me after my mom passed away and neither of these people were any help. I called several times a week to try to get paper work and have him discharged to move to an assisted living facility. I was told a different story every time I spoke to the administration. One excuse was that they couldn't turn in paper work because they were waiting on their staff to fill out this paper work, then the dr hadn't signed the release and on and on with excuses. I finally pulled my dad out after speaking to the administrator and hearing more reasons that he had not been discharged. You can not call there, the phone rings and rings with no answer. I banged on the door for a half hour and rang the door to try to take my dad in for the night after we had been out for the day. Finally staff came but I had to take my dad in to help him get settled back in because they were too busy. Dont go here if you love who you are putting in there. It is seriously the worst rehab I have ever dealt with!

  • Bryce Marshall
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    Amazing building with amazing staff really willing to go the extra mile to care for residents needs

  • Desmond Robertson
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    1st all 5 stars are from staff 2nd administration needs to learn the ADA laws I know of 5 very big violations with threats of retaiations if you push it. It is a similar lockdown facility (I have seen better ones) Most the staff is ok some are outstanding and could and should move to a better facility. Do to 3 people in each room rest is not going to happen and makes enjoyment of books or TV almost impossible. (Simple fix would be provide head phones or little bed side remote speakers like they do in most hospitals. Do to the way it operates if you are on government medical that will lock you into the system do to not giving real healing environment. FYI if there is a retaleaton to the this review I will take other steps some might force a closing at least there will be fines for ADA violations (service animals part both federal and state) also personal aid violatons.

About Meadow Brook Rehabilitation And Nursing

General Information

Legal Business NameBeaver Valley Hospital
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 17, 2004 (15 years)
Capacity41
Residents35
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Meadow Brook Rehabilitation And Nursing

Meadow Brook Rehabilitation And Nursing was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Utah Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Meadow Brook Rehabilitation And Nursing has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Meadow Brook Rehabilitation And Nursing require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 15min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
1hr 35min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 20min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
94.3%
91.2%
91.2%
97.0%
96.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
36.4%
45.5%
33.3%
45.8%
48.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
48.4%
41.9%
40.6%
48.4%
27.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
25.4%
27.3%
25.9%
38.6%
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
40.7%
37.5%
19.0%
50.0%
16.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
20.7%
16.7%
17.2%
33.3%
13.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
2.9%
3.0%
9.1%
9.1%
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
8.3%
9.1%
4.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
21.1%
14.0%
20.5%
-
8.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
3.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
3.0%
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
5.9%
6.1%
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

28.6%
59.3%
69.6%
90.0%
91.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.9%
77.8%
77.8%
77.8%
88.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
63.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
16.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places