Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

St Mark's Hospital Transitional Care

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Utah
  3. Salt Lake City Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • steven mills
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    My surgery was scheduled and when I arrived I was taken to my room got into there gown and within an hour I was heading to surgery. Every nurse and doctor that I talked with was friendly, informative. I felt at ease and confident that I was going to be fine. The surgery went well and my recovery was comfortable and efficient. That called me. Few days later I received a call from the hospital staff checking to see how I was and if there was anything they could help. And fallow up from my physicians office. St Marks Hospital has my confidence and where I will go for any hospitalization when needed.

  • Jon Culver
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    The staff were all wonderful. They helped put me at ease during a difficult procedure. The only reason that I do not give this experience five stars is because of the money situation. I was called the night before and was told that I could pay for it then. I thought that was ridiculous. Who eats at a restaurant and pays the day before you go? I arrived the day of the procedure and was told to pay. I did, but, once again, who pays for a haircut before you see how things turn out? Anyhow, the procedure went well, and I get a bill in the mail about a week later. Didn't I pay for everything at the time of the procedure?

  • Michael Plain
    ★★★★★ in the last week

    The nurses, and their assistants worked very hard at making me comfortable. It was a good stay. The Dr's were good as well. It was as good as it gets when you are sick and can't do a lot on your own! The care was the best!

  • Patti Silcox
    ★★★★★ 2 weeks ago

    Top notch care. Awesome nurses and Doctors. ICU staff was amazing. PCU staff was very caring. The rooms were incredibly small and potentially hazardous for those with limited mobility. All in all considering the circumstances the stay was good.

  • Debra Casey
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    I've never been big on P As but there are a few good one and the reason is because they don't listen to you I know I'm no Dr. but there are things I know more about myself because I've been seeing Dr.s for more then half my life and they don't know body as well as I do. But I'll tell you now the Dr's I've have found at that hospital have been really good, and I know I'm not an easy person to get along with if they don't listen to me but wright now I'm glad I found these Dr's. they have been really good about taking care of me and doing their best to do so I just want to thank them all. Debra Casey

About St Mark's Hospital Transitional Care

General Information

Legal Business NameNorthern Utah Healthcare Corporation
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 11, 1994 (25 years)
Capacity14
Residents14
Percent Occupied100%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalYes
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for St Mark's Hospital Transitional Care

St Mark's Hospital Transitional Care was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Utah Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 24, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep all essential equipment working safely.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of St Mark's Hospital Transitional Care require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 20min
1hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA

40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
3hr 35min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 55min
3hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 6hr 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
94.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
96.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
48.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
27.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
17.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
16.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
13.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
5.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
4.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
8.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
7.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
4.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
3.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
99.4%
91.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
96.3%
93.4%
93.4%
93.4%
88.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
37.8%
44.8%
43.7%
43.2%
63.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
53.6%
61.7%
62.3%
50.0%
16.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
1.6%
1.9%
0.0%
0.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017UT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places