Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Spanish Fork Rehabilitation And Nursing

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Utah (UT)
  4. Spanish Fork
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    I have nothing but good things to say about two individuals who greatly effected my life at Spanish Fork Nursing. Nicole Smith is hands down the most fantastic nurse. She is kind, compassionate, and loving towards all her patients. She spends an inordinate amount of time listening to their individual problems, and coming up with the best resolution. Patience is also another great asset to the team. She is an amazing cook, housekeeper, and care advocate. She always is attending to the needs of the residents. She works her tail off and never complains about anything. Spanish Fork would not be the same without these two amazing women. Spending time at Spanish Fork is always enjoyable. It is a great place to send your loved ones.

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    This place is really excellent! The staff here are really friendly and tries their best to help the residents here! I have really enjoyed my stay here and will miss the staff and the residents when I move into assisted living next month! I made some good friends here which I am happy about!

  • ★★★★★ 3 weeks ago

    My mom has been in there for a few months and I her both have appreciated how well she has been taken care of. If there ever was an issue it was addressed and taken care of immediately! Weston, Wendy, Olivia and Julia have been amazing with my mom! Thank you!

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    The facility is organized and structured. It is easy to work with the aids, administrator, and the rest of the staff because of their friendly personalities and willingness to help the residents.

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    Therapy staff is awesome & provided personalized care to assist our loved one in getting home. Thank you for the great service !!

About Spanish Fork Rehabilitation And Nursing

General Information

Legal Business NameBeaver Valley Hospital
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Partnership
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 14, 2015 (3 years)
Capacity29
Residents27
Percent Occupied93%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Spanish Fork Rehabilitation And Nursing

Spanish Fork Rehabilitation And Nursing
was reviewed by to have a rating of 1 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Utah Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

December 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide bedrooms that don't allow residents to see each other when privacy is needed.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAt least once a month, have a licensed pharmacist review each resident's medication(s) and report any irregularities to the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.

September 9, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive or get specialized rehabilitative services per the patient's assessment or plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Spanish Fork Rehabilitation And Nursing require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

10min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
40min
1hr 25min
ReportedExpected
RN
1hr 30min
4hr 30min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.2%
93.5%
93.5%
93.5%
93.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
95.5%
95.5%
97.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
49.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
42.9%
36.4%
23.8%
23.8%
30.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
23.0%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.0%
22.7%
0.0%
33.3%
12.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.5%
8.0%
4.5%
19.0%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
9.1%
7.7%
0.0%
-
9.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
8.3%
3.8%
4.5%
0.0%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
5.2%
6.0%
6.3%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
3.8%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

69.4%
93.1%
100.0%
81.2%
91.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
89.7%
89.7%
89.7%
88.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
60.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
23.8%
-
9.5%
23.8%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places