Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Rocky Mountain Care - Hunter Hollow

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Utah (UT)
  4. West Valley City
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.5 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Belle Karabatsos
    ★★★★★ 2 months ago

    I feel horrible for allowing my mother to receive her skilled nursing care from this facility. She was over medicated, neglected by the evening staff, and was slated to be discharged to go home two weeks prematurely. They allowed her electrolytes to drop dangerously low and left her pic line open for a two hour period of time resulting in the family taking her to the ER for urgent care. The food they served had a smell and taste of fish (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) - not sure why.... but this was the case for all meals. Note to self... do your homework before agreeing to send your loved ones to these types of facilities. :-(

  • Toni Marie
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I had applied with Hunter Hollow, and had gotten a job there. The place was always clean. The CNAs as well as other employees were very welcoming. All were very professional, they were very willing to help anyone who needed it. Meals look amazing as well as taste amazing. Great place!

  • Emina Ibrahimovic
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    We placed my father here a year ago due to his terminal illness. We took him out 2 days later because of the lack of care he got. The nurses wouldn't change his diaper, feed him or give him water. All they did was give him too much medicine so he wouldn't be able to get out of bed. He was not himself for the remaining 2 weeks he did live because of how much of his medicine they were giving him. They placed a cup of water next to his bed and expected him to drink it. When at that point of his life he was unable to do anything for himself. When we were ready to take him out they had lost all of his belongings and it took them half an hour to find where they had put everything. Do NOT place anyone you love here. If we didn't take my father out he would have died because of the lack of care. The "Skilled Nurses" at Hunter Hollow should all be fired and never allowed to work at a nursing home again. There is no love or care or compassion. They only do this for the money. You all disgust me.

  • Brandon Mark Stout
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    This is an attractive skilled nursing facility with a nice, clean appearance, and across the street from the hospital. Staff and administration are friendly and easy to work with.

  • Marsha Kimberlin
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Friendly and caring staff.

About Rocky Mountain Care - Hunter Hollow

General Information

Legal Business NameBeaver Valley Hospital
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Other
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 1, 1980 (38 years)
Capacity124
Residents99
Percent Occupied80%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Rocky Mountain Care - Hunter Hollow

Rocky Mountain Care - Hunter Hollow was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Utah Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

September 3, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

December 16, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,560 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Rocky Mountain Care - Hunter Hollow require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 50min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
50min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 50min
1hr 30min
ReportedExpected
RN
6hr 5min
4hr 55min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.4%
82.7%
82.7%
82.7%
93.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.0%
95.6%
93.2%
96.1%
97.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
56.2%
59.5%
52.9%
60.0%
49.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
37.5%
30.8%
26.0%
24.7%
30.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
20.6%
10.3%
13.2%
14.8%
16.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
9.1%
4.5%
5.6%
6.8%
17.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
21.6%
7.4%
9.4%
7.4%
12.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
7.3%
17.0%
16.6%
21.5%
10.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
3.0%
1.4%
0.0%
6.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.1%
5.1%
7.5%
9.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
1.5%
2.8%
1.4%
9.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.5%
3.0%
5.6%
6.7%
5.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
5.9%
5.5%
3.9%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
3.5%
2.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
1.5%
1.5%
0.0%
1.3%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

94.4%
92.9%
94.4%
94.6%
91.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.8%
88.3%
88.3%
88.3%
88.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
69.6%
62.9%
59.4%
66.2%
60.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
9.0%
21.2%
26.5%
27.2%
18.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.8%
1.4%
0.0%
0.0%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016UT
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places