Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Heritage Hall Blacksburg

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Virginia (VA)
  4. Blacksburg
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Heritage Hall Blacksburg

General Information

Legal Business NameAmerican Healthcare LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareOctober 1, 2001 (16 years)
Capacity194
Residents128
Percent Occupied66%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Heritage Hall Blacksburg

Heritage Hall Blacksburg
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Virginia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 2, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionLet residents refuse treatment, refuse to take part in an experiment, or formulate advance directives.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.

June 18, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHonor a residents' rights as a residents of the nursing home, free of coercion and reprisal, and as citizens or residents of the United States.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionReview or revise the resident's care plan after any major change in physical or mental health.

July 31, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Heritage Hall Blacksburg require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 5min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

75.8%
68.5%
68.5%
68.5%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
99.0%
97.1%
99.1%
100.0%
93.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
40.7%
55.8%
61.5%
77.1%
52.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
23.8%
22.3%
28.2%
29.7%
23.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
23.0%
13.8%
20.5%
13.5%
20.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
29.6%
29.2%
26.7%
26.7%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
10.6%
13.1%
10.6%
14.3%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
24.6%
22.2%
23.8%
21.5%
8.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
4.8%
2.9%
2.8%
7.2%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
8.1%
8.1%
9.2%
12.3%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.1%
6.9%
9.0%
8.6%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.6%
8.7%
14.8%
8.1%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
4.8%
3.8%
3.7%
3.6%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.5%
2.3%
2.0%
2.3%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
1.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

90.1%
95.0%
96.3%
89.0%
83.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
87.3%
91.5%
91.5%
91.5%
81.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
61.5%
64.1%
55.7%
47.8%
65.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
50.0%
53.5%
41.9%
29.9%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
1.3%
0.7%
2.3%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
0.7%
0.4%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened