Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Autumn Care Of Chesapeake

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Virginia (VA)
  4. Chesapeake
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Autumn Care Of Chesapeake

General Information

Legal Business NameAutumn Corporation
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMay 24, 1991 (26 years)
Capacity117
Residents100
Percent Occupied85%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Autumn Care Of Chesapeake

Autumn Care Of Chesapeake
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Virginia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

March 10, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$106,470 fine
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.

April 9, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

February 12, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$59,118 fine
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

March 28, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Autumn Care Of Chesapeake require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 30min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
60min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 50min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

93.0%
91.8%
91.8%
91.8%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
52.9%
41.4%
26.0%
49.3%
93.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
65.6%
69.0%
70.6%
65.5%
52.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
36.2%
27.9%
23.6%
29.0%
23.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
10.3%
22.5%
52.8%
40.1%
20.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
22.9%
24.3%
21.9%
21.1%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
27.1%
29.3%
57.6%
33.9%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
9.3%
7.4%
10.4%
3.5%
8.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.6%
13.0%
1.4%
5.6%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
5.4%
7.3%
3.3%
6.3%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
8.7%
8.7%
1.4%
0.0%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
4.3%
4.1%
5.6%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.6%
4.2%
0.9%
1.1%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

66.3%
65.1%
58.6%
69.8%
83.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
82.9%
61.9%
61.9%
61.9%
81.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
53.3%
58.5%
64.4%
66.5%
65.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
17.4%
16.3%
17.9%
17.1%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.3%
2.4%
2.2%
1.6%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.0%
0.3%
0.3%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened