Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Carrington Place Of Chesapeake

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Virginia
  3. Chesapeake Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.4 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Clifford
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I had a family member at Carrington Place of Chesapeake. The staff was very professional and concerned with the needs of my family member. The nurse that was caring for my family member showed compassion above what was required . The administration was concerned with the needs of patients as well as their families. From my experience, I would recommend Carrington place to others.

  • Deon TIRRELL
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    they changed the name of the place to greenbrier rehabilitiin center,same people different name ,i was a patient there this is what they fed me,would u give this to a dog??

  • Joan Harmon
    ★★★★★ 4 years ago

    Both my parents are in the same room together at Carrington Place of Chesapeake. They were admitted at the same time. The staff is loving and caring. The administration is concerned with the needs of patients as well as their families. I gave it four stars because the floors could be cleaner.

  • Carrie Vollmer
    ★★★★★ 3 years ago

    If you love your loved one, as I am sure you do, do NOT under ANY circumstances allow them to stay here for ANY reason. My mother was a resident for less than 2 months last year recovering from a broken hip. She had a plethora of medical issues that were all listed in her chart. I saw roaches in her room and in the halls NIGHTLY. The "food" they served was an absolute joke. They did not keep up with my mother's doctor appointments or transportation to and from said appointments. My mother hadn't been feeling well for a few days. I had witnessed her saying something to the nurse myself. Come to find out, Mom's concerns were ignored. When she called for assistance one day last May, it took the nurse IN EXCESS of 45 minutes to walk all of the 20 ft to her room from Nurse's station. By the time she got there, my mother had passed. While cleaning up before I got there, they managed to LOSE HER TEETH (which were never found). Time discrepancies between paramedic, nursing staff, doctor and coroner as to what time she actually passed as well as conflicting "facts" (from the SAME nurse each time) as to what exactly happened WHEN my mom passed. Please, LOVE your loved ones enough NOT to send them here.

  • tony young
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Helped my dad get his health back! He is coming home soon, thank you!

About Carrington Place Of Chesapeake

General Information

Legal Business NameChesapeake Rehabilitation And Care Center, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 1, 1998 (21 years)
Capacity120
Residents105
Percent Occupied88%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Carrington Place Of Chesapeake

Carrington Place Of Chesapeake was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Virginia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 27, 2017 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program for mentally-ill and mentally-retarded patients.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEncode each residents assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

June 27, 2016 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$35,100 fine

September 25, 2015 - 4 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$18,168 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Carrington Place Of Chesapeake require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 15min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
20min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

94.1%
81.2%
80.2%
80.2%
94.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
82.1%
77.4%
82.2%
74.2%
94.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
55.6%
29.4%
31.2%
64.1%
53.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
19.4%
17.4%
18.6%
18.0%
22.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
28.6%
39.9%
42.3%
17.7%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
3.4%
4.6%
6.0%
15.1%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
29.1%
36.0%
36.4%
19.2%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
16.0%
12.4%
16.9%
12.2%
7.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
7.7%
2.1%
8.2%
10.9%
5.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
8.5%
10.0%
11.6%
18.0%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.2%
1.2%
0.0%
1.1%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.2%
3.3%
0.0%
2.2%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.1%
3.2%
6.7%
3.2%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.7%
3.0%
2.5%
1.3%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
1.1%
1.1%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

59.5%
50.7%
65.8%
59.5%
85.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
55.4%
49.3%
47.2%
47.2%
84.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
79.3%
60.1%
-
70.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
21.6%
31.8%
42.4%
42.1%
14.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
4.1%
2.3%
2.4%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.2%
1.6%
2.8%
3.9%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places