Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Virginia (VA)
  4. Fairfax
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 2.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

    The staff are professional, compassionate and knowledgable. The facility is clean, well kept. The gardens are lovely, an unexpected oasis with a beautiful koi pond. Tge food/meals are delicious, varied and fresh. Certainly a hidden gem for rehab's Thank you.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    TERRIBLE - My Mom broke her neck, shoulder and received stitches while in this facility. They wanted her out because she required supervision since her balance was a little off...isn't that why one goes to a nursing center? When they kicked her out, they told me they would put her in a cab to my home and if I wasn't there, they would take her to Adult Protective Services. Addie, the director, actually hung the phone up on me when I was trying to schedule a reasonable time for drop off. SOOOO unprofessional and CARE is NOT in their vocabulary!

  • ★★★★★ 6 months ago

    Place did not looked professionally and attractive to work for the facility, I had an interview recently, wait time/done of almost TWO HOURS! stressful, place looked shut down, I saw a couple of residents without a smile on their face as they were living a poor life, saw no CNA at all at the hallways as there was no movements going on. I have read the review before my interview and was ready to expect a poor rate about this place and so it was as expected, but was giving a bit hope into this place and give it a chance, since they advertise 16/hour IF YOU WORK EVERY WEEKEND ONLY, which they did not state that specifically on website. But no, its only two dollars (thats what they say even though on the website it says 1.50) confusing- from 13.35. They will not give you any bit of raise even with experience, seem like they were cheap, ah and that's after 30 days of training with 7.25?! like I don't need a whole month of training, I have not heard or seen a facility or agency or whatever have a long training process than 2 weeks only, seem so cheap. By the way, its not the rate I am most interested, don't get me wrong, but I'm disappointed I did not see a light of charming place and happiness going on in those residents faces, as there was no team players or good quality of care. By the way it does have cameras on each hallway as the place was running bad or something, really suspicious about it. Whoever applies here , you've been warn.

  • ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Please do not apply for a job here. They're advertising 16.00 an hour for the safety cna position but when you get there you'll learn that it's only 7.25 for the first 30 days. Not to mention that the staff forgot about me and went home for the day during my interview which was last Thursday and I have yet to hear from them. Very unprofessional

  • ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    One call to this facility and it's clear; they don't care.

About Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameFairfax Nursing Center, Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 1, 1976 (42 years)
Capacity200
Residents183
Percent Occupied92%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing Center

Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing Center
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Virginia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 27, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that doctors visit residents regularly, as required.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.

May 14, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain laboratory services only when ordered by the attending physician.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive or get quality laboratory services/tests in a timely manner to meet the needs of residents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionLet residents refuse treatment, refuse to take part in an experiment, or formulate advance directives.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Fairfax Rehabilitation And Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 40min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 40min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 20min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
6hr 40min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.3%
99.3%
99.3%
99.3%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
96.9%
96.1%
94.1%
97.9%
93.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
83.3%
78.0%
79.6%
78.0%
52.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
21.4%
25.2%
26.7%
26.7%
23.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.2%
17.2%
12.6%
14.7%
20.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.3%
21.1%
18.3%
17.4%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.0%
8.5%
7.5%
10.9%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.4%
7.6%
1.8%
0.0%
8.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.5%
9.5%
5.3%
4.2%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
3.3%
4.3%
2.5%
2.3%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.8%
1.6%
4.7%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.6%
4.8%
6.1%
0.7%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.3%
2.3%
2.2%
2.1%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.6%
1.8%
1.0%
0.5%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

85.0%
82.9%
84.5%
90.1%
83.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.9%
89.2%
89.2%
89.2%
81.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
35.2%
50.2%
44.1%
43.4%
65.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
6.5%
9.2%
8.9%
4.5%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9%
3.8%
4.1%
4.4%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.4%
0.4%
0.9%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places