Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Lexington Court Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Virginia
  3. Henrico Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.1 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Shannon Jones
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Lexington Court is an AMAZING place to Rehab. The rehab department takes personal interest in your well being. They go above and beyond (the extra mile) to improve your current health. The therapists all appear to have been called to do this line of work. Very caring and thorough with their rehab techniques. What a Godsend they are!!! Additionally, the long term residents all seem to be happy and engaged with the numerous activities and outings. The facility is well kept inside and out. A true blessing to the surrounding community.

  • Jenny Hernandez
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I've been a LPTA at Lexington Court for almost 11 years and highly recommend our facility for rehab services! We have an outstanding and caring rehab director, Tim Burner, and our rehab staff has years of experience in simple and complex cases. All facilities have challenges but we try our best to provide great outcomes!

  • Sherri Coleman
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    I definitely recommend. They have been great with my father. Consistent and hardworking staff .

  • Shawn Ellis
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    I was visiting a friend. She is here for rehab. She is unable to transfer without assistance. She hit the call bell and the wait began. Finally, I stepped out to get someone. I found a male LPN having a personal conversation on the phone sitting right outside her door. When I asked for help.....he said "I'll call an aide". I looked up and down the hall and saw the aides were busy. I said are you not able to assist her? He said "no I'm the nurse".....well guess what?! I'm a nurse too!! I'm an RN and it isn't beneath me to assist my patients to a bedpan!! So I can pretty much guarantee is isn't beneath you!! When I spoke to the unit manager....he was no help! Why is it so difficult to treat people with kindness, respect and DIGNITY!!?? I am out raged! I am in and out of nursing homes and rehab centers all the time. This is one of the worst! Don't let the fact that it's located in the west end fool you! If you love your family....don't put them here!!!!

  • Karen Shirar
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    They were horrible. They messed up my father's j-tube and he had to spend another week at Saint Mary's. Now, I understand life happens. But that doctor there just completely lacked empathy. Just no bedside manner and he made it clear he did not care about my father. He reasoning was, dad has stage 4 cancer, so he did not matter. Yes, dad had cancer, but the place was supposed to take care of him, not usher him to the grave faster. Avoid this place at all costs. ____ Update to reply: We did talk to somebody, the doctor. I thought he was in charge. And he said his comments in front of an entire room of nurses. You can't resolve the issue; my dad is dead. It was James May if you want to look at the records.

About Lexington Court Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr

General Information

Legal Business NameLexington Post Acute Care, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 1, 1993 (27 years)
Capacity190
Residents163
Percent Occupied86%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Lexington Court Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr

Lexington Court Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Virginia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 8, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide housekeeping and maintenance services.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Lexington Court Rehabilitation & Health Care Ctr require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 5min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
30min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 25min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 15min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

90.2%
94.8%
94.8%
94.8%
94.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.8%
95.7%
96.3%
97.0%
94.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
69.8%
59.3%
61.2%
66.7%
53.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
13.5%
13.3%
12.2%
10.7%
22.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
20.8%
19.2%
15.6%
17.0%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
6.6%
6.9%
8.8%
6.3%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
15.4%
11.8%
16.9%
14.3%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
6.2%
11.3%
5.2%
9.9%
7.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.4%
3.1%
5.3%
3.9%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.5%
1.9%
3.9%
5.9%
5.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.8%
1.6%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
5.5%
5.0%
3.7%
0.8%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
1.4%
2.8%
4.4%
5.2%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.3%
2.1%
0.6%
1.0%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.7%
1.5%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

89.9%
89.2%
91.3%
80.8%
85.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.4%
83.9%
84.4%
84.4%
84.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
65.6%
67.4%
66.3%
67.7%
70.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
16.2%
18.5%
16.2%
11.4%
14.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.8%
1.6%
1.6%
2.4%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
1.2%
1.2%
2.1%
1.4%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places