Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Birmingham Green

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Virginia (VA)
  4. Manassas
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Photos

Photo Attributions:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    Birmingham Green was an oasis for my good friend with Alzheimers, diabetes and cancer. I am a former nurse and visited Bill often. If not for this lovely facility, he would have had no place to go. Bill lived there for several years. He was first admitted to the assisted-living facility, and when he could no longer care for himself, he was transferred to a stepped-up care unit at a different location in the same facility. There is a very low turn-over rate in nursing and health care staff and most have spent the better part of their careers there. These angels give the best of care to their patients and are family to those whose who have been forgotten by or who have outlived their loved ones. The facility is clean and tidy and the food, though not fancy, is calibrated for the dietary needs of each patient. I took Bill for walks on the lovely grounds, and after I supplied the paperwork to confirm the health of my dog, I was able to bring her with me for Bill and others to enjoy. Birmingham Green has daily activities for the residents, from games to physical therapy. It was a wonderful home for Bill.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Birmingham used to have a bad rap in 10 years ago but we were told it has been redone and new management so my grandmother decided to give it a try. We could not be more disappointed with the standard of care at this facility. When my grandmother would Press the bedside nurse assistance button it would take over 10 minutes each time before any nurse came in and to be met with a subpar attitude doesn't make the situation any better. The rooms are so small I barely had room to transfer my grandmother from wheelchair to bed. There were Dead beetles along the base boards. In general the nurses did not seem like they cared and often had an attitude or seemed frustrated. Each time I called the facility it took at least two phone calls to actually get through and transferred to my grandmother. Often times I would call and either nobody would speak after they said hello or put me on hold and not come back. They definitely need to be trained better and customer service. I would never send my grandmother back to Birmingham green and I would not recommend.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    Inadequate. Food is deplorable - heavily laced with salt. After one month's stay my husband's condition which had improved, now deteriorated. Personnel missed noticing his wheezing, coughing & congestion until he had to be transferred to PW Hosp with pneumonia despite my reminders. He did not bounce back until I HAD to remove him for his health. I never again saw rehab people after his return from PW Hosp. Did not receive adequate advance notice of his discharge so that I could have home health care ready & waiting. Procedures ordered were not carried out; general condition rarely checked until obvious he was sitting in a puddle. NEVER saw or spoke to doctor of doctor's assistance entire 2 months. Care is as best as can be expected; too many very ill & damaged patients for the number of caring personnel. Must admit Birmingham Green is far superior to Manassas Nursing & Rehab.

  • ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I've had issues with the care my Momma is receiving. Although appearing to be extremely concerned I have my doubt. Dr. for residents shows no comparison and doesn't want to listen to anything you have to say.

  • ★★★★★ a month ago

About Birmingham Green

General Information

Legal Business NameNorthern Virginia Health Center Commission
Ownership TypeGovernment - City/County
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 1, 2006 (11 years)
Capacity180
Residents177
Percent Occupied98%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Birmingham Green

Birmingham Green
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Virginia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 20, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

September 17, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure menus meet the resident's nutritional needs and that there is a prepared menu by which nutritious meals have been planned for the resident and followed.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTell the attending physician the results of x-rays and other tests, in a timely manner.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents to easily view the results of the nursing home's most recent inspection.

January 22, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Birmingham Green require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 10min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
45min
60min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 25min
4hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 25min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.1%
99.4%
99.4%
99.4%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
91.6%
90.7%
89.6%
90.1%
93.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
67.4%
67.4%
67.4%
65.3%
52.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
24.1%
22.2%
20.9%
18.6%
23.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
7.3%
8.6%
7.1%
7.3%
20.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.7%
19.1%
18.8%
17.6%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
5.1%
6.1%
6.9%
3.0%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
18.3%
14.9%
18.7%
12.5%
8.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.2%
3.8%
5.6%
4.3%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.1%
6.6%
6.4%
2.4%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.9%
2.6%
3.3%
1.3%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
3.6%
1.9%
1.2%
4.4%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.4%
3.1%
3.7%
3.1%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.1%
0.6%
0.5%
0.5%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

97.6%
93.1%
86.8%
85.2%
83.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
94.5%
91.4%
91.4%
91.4%
81.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
65.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
20.0%
21.6%
11.4%
13.9%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
3.0%
3.2%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
1.2%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places