Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing Center

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Virginia (VA)
  4. Richmond
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Rainbow Writer
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    I was there for eight days 3 years ago. In those 8 days, there was no bed ordered for me so i spent 2 days sleeping in my wheelchair. The last straw was when 2 "nurses" dropped me from a Hoya lift! Then they proceeded to argue saying I didn't fall. Technically I didn't fall because I hung with my airs from the bar. The next day I asked to go to the hospital for an X-ray because my leg was swollen. They said they had an in house doctor, but I insisted on going to to the hospital. Finally the hospital did the right thing and reported the incompetence and moved me to a better facility. It was at that place that I learned GB jacked my wound care so bad, my leg had to be amputated. I wish I had sued GB. They have no clue or compassion. Every time I drive passed it, I pray the patients have found a more competent facility. As soon as I know it is empty, I'm praying it burns down do it can't be rebuilt. Please don't inflict Glen Bernie's "care" on your loved ones no matter how much you hate them.

  • Jeanette Groome
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Individualized Nursing and Rehab care needs to promote the highest level function to be successful at home .

  • Jasia Redmond
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    This is the worst place.... it has really bad nurses. One of the nurses took a patient outside and left her and another nurse found her and the nurse that left her outside.. Admitted that she forgot all about her.

  • Angela Hope
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    This facility does not even deserve one star. Beware sending your loved ones here. If you want your loved one to be ignored, told that they stink, given attitude when you ask for help, this is the place for them. My mother was treated HORRIBLE at this facility. There are only a handful of nurses and CNA's that actually care. The rest of them, why are you even in this field of work? Don't take your issues with your job out on innocent patients. Would you treat your mother that way? Hopefully not! I filed a grievance with them and the insurance company that sent my mother there. Hopefully things will change for the patients sake.

  • Cody Beavers
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    We pick my mom up cause she check her self out I wasn't please with the staff I've seen better doesn't EVEN DESERVE A 1 STAR. They where all sitting around a computer and after reading some reports it horrible close tht crap down

About Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing Center

General Information

Legal Business NameWest End Operations LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareMarch 27, 2007 (11 years)
Capacity125
Residents111
Percent Occupied89%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing Center

Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing Center
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Virginia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 28, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
GFewActual HarmComplaint+InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.

July 16, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident who enters the nursing home without a catheter is not given a catheter, unless medically necessary, and that incontinent patients receive proper services to prevent urinary tract infections and restore normal bladder functions.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep signed and dated reports of x-rays and other diagnostic services.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Glenburnie Rehab & Nursing Center require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

1hr 50min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
60min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
25min
1hr 15min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 15min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

95.4%
93.8%
93.8%
93.8%
94.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
93.9%
91.8%
100.0%
100.0%
93.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
34.6%
42.9%
44.8%
46.5%
52.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
18.8%
11.3%
11.9%
13.3%
23.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
18.1%
11.6%
14.7%
13.3%
20.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.6%
10.1%
6.9%
7.9%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
33.9%
21.3%
25.8%
13.6%
16.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
3.2%
9.0%
8.1%
11.2%
8.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.1%
7.0%
5.6%
11.5%
7.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
10.4%
5.6%
8.9%
12.7%
6.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
1.7%
2.9%
1.4%
1.3%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.5%
2.8%
2.8%
1.3%
4.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.0%
2.7%
5.4%
4.9%
3.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1%
2.3%
3.3%
3.8%
2.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

92.8%
91.4%
95.7%
98.4%
83.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
93.7%
81.2%
81.2%
81.2%
81.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
81.1%
84.7%
82.7%
81.2%
65.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
7.9%
6.2%
9.1%
9.1%
16.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.4%
0.5%
0.5%
0.0%
1.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.5%
0.5%
0.5%
0.3%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016VA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places