Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

The Laurels Of University Park

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Virginia
  3. Richmond Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.0 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Toney Fitzgerald
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    My brother, Eddie, has been at The Laurels for about three weeks. He is in the Rehab portion of the facility. Eddie has had a wonderful experience there. The staff is friendly, courteous and professional. The staff I have met, like Tameka and Katherine in Activities, have been wonderful answering my questions and making me feel comfortable leaving my brother there. PT and OT have worked well with Eddie and he has recovered quickly. I would have no issues sending any of my family members to The Laurels of University Park.

  • SARAH HEDRICK
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    The Laurels of University Park was wonderful to my grandfather when he needed to go somewhere for nursing and rehabilitation care. Morgan in Admissions made the process seamless and Amy, the Rehab Director, came in over the weekend to check in the day after he was admitted, which had been late on a Friday evening. Excellent care and highly recommended.

  • James Tunstall
    ★★★★★ a week ago

    I came back here for rehab a second time because everything here was so great and I am so confident going home this time again. The Laurels offers great rehab and nursing care. Once again had a great experience.

  • Joseph DeLise
    ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    The laurels of university park have really taken great care of my mother. She was in a facility before that was taking away her quality of life. Thank god for the laurels of university park because they gave my mother the quality of her life back. The nurses and the rest of the staff are some of the nicest people I have met. I showed up one day, with no notice and a few pizza's with some of our family and they promptly accommodated our needs and opened up a private dining room for us to surprise my mother. The head janitor and all the other workers made sure we had everything that we needed. I would highly recommend the laurels of university park. I have never seen my mother sound and look better. she is just generally alot happier since being here.

  • Rebecca Lowry-Ruth
    ★★★★★ a month ago

    Rehab is the best!! My doctors are great and nursing took good care of me. Would return if needed rehab again.

About The Laurels Of University Park

General Information

Legal Business NameThe Laurels Of University Park, LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 15, 1978 (42 years)
Capacity145
Residents137
Percent Occupied94%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for The Laurels Of University Park

The Laurels Of University Park was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 1 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Virginia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

April 13, 2017 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$73,783 fine
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionAllow residents the right to participate in the planning or revision of care and treatment.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop policies and procedures for influenza and pneumococcal immunizations.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
CManyPotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmHealth InspectionPrepare food that is nutritional, appetizing, tasty, attractive, well-cooked, and at the right temperature.
BSomePotential for Minimal HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide a tasty and well-balanced diet that meets the nutritional needs of each resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of The Laurels Of University Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 5min
2hr 20min
ReportedExpected
CNA
55min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
35min
1hr 10min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 40min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

69.9%
55.0%
55.0%
55.0%
94.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.5%
70.6%
75.8%
79.4%
94.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
48.8%
58.1%
59.5%
51.2%
53.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
14.9%
16.7%
17.3%
17.6%
22.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
28.3%
37.7%
25.2%
23.6%
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.0%
18.1%
18.1%
16.3%
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
25.8%
30.0%
21.8%
18.0%
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
13.9%
12.7%
14.3%
9.3%
7.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
9.2%
4.4%
12.2%
10.8%
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
5.4%
10.4%
6.0%
2.9%
5.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.2%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.0%
3.9%
1.1%
2.1%
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.9%
6.9%
3.3%
2.1%
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
0.0%
0.6%
2.1%
2.9%
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

49.0%
53.6%
68.1%
66.2%
85.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
71.8%
54.2%
54.4%
54.4%
84.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
60.7%
46.5%
49.5%
68.8%
70.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
17.3%
16.0%
22.9%
31.0%
14.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.9%
4.2%
2.7%
1.7%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.9%
0.6%
0.5%
1.1%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places