Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Lake Prince Woods, Inc

  1. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
  2. Virginia
  3. Suffolk Skilled Nursing Home Facilities
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By submitting this form, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy and our Agreement to be Contacted by Telephone. You also consent that we, or our partner providers, can reach out to you using a system that can auto-dial. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Photos

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.7 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Michele Fault
    ★★★★★ 8 months ago

    So happy that my brother was able to receive rehab services here. We saw a great improvement both physically and mentally. The staff was caring, friendly and professional. My family from out of town were very impressed with the cleanliness of the facility, the grounds and staff. My brother's complaint was that they give you too much food, lol! Thank you Lake Prince for taking care of my brother.

  • Barbara Johnson-Williams
    ★★★★★ 11 months ago

    This community is filled with nothing but caring people. The staff there are great. I am more than happy to recommend this as a great retirement community.

  • vicky jeffers
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    Worked here as a nurse on AL. Couldn't ask for better residents or co workers. Overall a great place. Very clean and food is great

  • Michael Casey
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    I can't speak about the independent living side of this community. It probably is fine. The memory Dementia unit is another story altogether. What a disaster. After having a number of items stolen from my mother while in their care, we decided to put a nanny cam in place. We discovered a number of problems in just a few days that included theft, staff members using my mother's hairbrush, other residents sleeping in my mother's bed while she had to sleep on the floor for hours at a time.. I could go on and on but you get the picture. Management's reaction to what we saw? They became upset with US! They told us that we weren't allowed to video the employees as it violated their privacy. No apology was ever made about the endless list of problems that we saw. In fairness, I must say that operating a dementia unit for anyone other than the wealthy seems to be very difficult if not impossible. Most of these units are owned and operated by large conglomerates that are required to show shareholders a profit every quarter. As a result, the staffs and services provided to the residents have been slashed over the last ten years. Lake Prince Woods is more the rule rather than the exception. It was the third facility we tried in less than eighteen months. We were not demanding unusually fine levels of service. We merely wanted something other than what we considered abuse. It eventually became more affordable for us to build a small house for her and to provide round the clock care than to continue to try to locate an operation that provided her with proper care.

  • Richelle McKinney
    ★★★★★ 2 years ago

    I would feel very good about my loved one living here among loving staff and volunteers. The food is wonderful!

About Lake Prince Woods, Inc

General Information

Legal Business NameLake Prince Center, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareJanuary 14, 2003 (17 years)
Capacity40
Residents30
Percent Occupied75%
Program ParticipationMedicare
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityYes
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Lake Prince Woods, Inc

Lake Prince Woods, Inc was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5 stars.

About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Virginia Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C
Lake Prince Woods, Inc has not received any fines, complaints, or inspection problems in the last 3 years.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Lake Prince Woods, Inc require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 35min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
1hr 20min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 15min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 5min
4hr 25min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 5min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
96.2%
96.2%
96.2%
94.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
-
94.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
53.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
12.5%
20.0%
-
-
22.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
20.0%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
17.9%
22.7%
15.0%
-
15.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
4.5%
-
-
-
16.1%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
0.0%
0.0%
-
-
7.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
12.0%
-
-
-
5.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.4%
-
-
-
6.3%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.4%
15.0%
-
-
2.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
10.7%
9.1%
-
-
4.5%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.6%
9.1%
5.0%
-
3.7%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
4.9%
-
-
-
1.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
-
0.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
85.4%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.2%
98.1%
98.1%
98.1%
84.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
75.4%
70.2%
55.4%
70.6%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
21.9%
17.4%
13.2%
14.3%
14.2%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.7%
2.6%
0.0%
0.0%
1.8%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
3.9%
1.6%
0.0%
1.0%
0.9%
Q4 2016Q1 2017Q2 2017Q3 2017VA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places