Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regency Auburn LLC

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Washington (WA)
  4. Auburn
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 3.3 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • berly62
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    My sister is currently here for rehab and we couldn't be more happy. They treat her with respect and dignity, we are provided updates on her progress and what she needs to work on. Her needs are always taken care of and we appreciate the upbeat positive attitude of the staff

  • Cynthia Gutierrez
    ★★★★★ 5 months ago

    I just got off the phone with a young woman who did an internship there and she told me she witnessed a man who wanted and asked to be put in his bed. He was told to wait 15 minutes. The man didn't want to wait and tried to do it himself. He fell and and the African guy CNA punched him in the rear! See what goes on in these place when the family is not there. This is criminal!!!!

  • Steve Woodard
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    My father has been at Regency for the past 2 years. At time his care has been great at other times not so much. I would still recommend this place to others however they are way understaffed! Some of the employees actually care and are there to help. Others I feel are there just for a paycheck. They just recently changed the name of the facility. Still not 100% sure what it is. They also did a bunch of work to the building itself. I feel that money could have been used in better ways. But I don't know all the details to their finances. I do know that my father pays alot of money out of pocket for mediocre care.

  • jim whitehead
    ★★★★★ 4 months ago

    Really nice staff. Clean

  • Maryanne Wolanski
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

    I received rehab from Regency Auburn from Nov. 4th thru Dec. 17th 2016 as an inpatient. The care and therapy staff were wonderful. All the staff make the patients feel like they really care about us. The meals were tasty with a choose of two entrees for lunch and dinner, I would highly recommend this place and actually did not want to leave. I felt like they were my second family. They have a lot of activities that make a person want to participate and also exercise classes that are fun even for someone like me in a wheelchair. I was also impressed with the nursing staff for always being punctual with my meds.

About Regency Auburn LLC

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareNovember 1, 1989 (28 years)
Capacity96
Residents60
Percent Occupied63%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsBoth
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regency Auburn LLC

Regency Auburn LLC
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 2 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Washington Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 28, 2016 - 13 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

January 5, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.

December 9, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionMaintain drug records and properly mark/label drugs and other similar products according to accepted professional standards.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
ESomePotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

May 13, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

October 23, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Payment DenialPayment denial for 3 days
---Fine$1,300 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regency Auburn LLC require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 20min
2hr 40min
ReportedExpected
CNA
50min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 10min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 45min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
92.6%
92.6%
92.6%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.9%
93.5%
90.7%
97.9%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
54.5%
52.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
8.5%
7.0%
11.6%
12.8%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
26.1%
33.1%
22.0%
32.2%
18.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.9%
6.8%
9.8%
8.9%
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
14.6%
13.2%
17.1%
23.8%
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
10.9%
2.5%
10.0%
4.0%
9.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
8.5%
11.1%
14.3%
2.1%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
4.8%
5.0%
6.1%
5.7%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
6.8%
4.8%
0.0%
2.3%
9.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
2.1%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
2.1%
2.2%
4.7%
6.4%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.5%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

59.6%
43.6%
48.5%
75.7%
85.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.3%
46.8%
46.8%
46.8%
83.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
72.1%
74.0%
73.8%
78.0%
67.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
32.0%
17.4%
17.8%
3.7%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.8%
3.1%
0.0%
1.3%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
1.4%
0.7%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places