Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Regency At The Park

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Washington (WA)
  4. College Place
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Regency At The Park

General Information

Legal Business NameBd College Place I LLC
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareAugust 1, 1974 (43 years)
Capacity106
Residents85
Percent Occupied80%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Regency At The Park

Regency At The Park
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Washington Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

October 20, 2016 - 9 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

August 10, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.

January 21, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

November 6, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintUpon the death of a resident, convey the residentís personal funds and an accounting of those funds to the appropriate party.

September 3, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care for residents in a way that maintains or improves their dignity and respect in full recognition of their individuality.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep the rate of medication errors (wrong drug, wrong dose, wrong time) to less than 5%.

July 29, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

March 4, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; and allow residents to use personal belongings to the extent possible.

January 13, 2015 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintTry to resolve each resident's complaints quickly.
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.

November 18, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
GFewActual HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
GFewActual HarmComplaint1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

October 7, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .

June 11, 2014 - 3 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
---Fine$1,625 fine

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Regency At The Park require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 25min
2hr 25min
ReportedExpected
CNA
30min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
3hr 60min
4hr 5min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 10min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

96.6%
98.4%
98.4%
98.4%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
94.9%
93.1%
95.2%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
70.6%
64.5%
69.0%
75.0%
52.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
28.3%
27.6%
39.3%
22.0%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
16.7%
12.6%
24.0%
29.3%
18.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
15.5%
14.3%
18.2%
16.9%
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.3%
5.2%
9.1%
14.0%
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
4.7%
1.4%
7.3%
11.9%
9.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
6.9%
5.1%
3.5%
8.6%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
4.4%
10.6%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
3.6%
5.6%
1.7%
8.9%
9.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.7%
1.7%
3.5%
5.2%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
3.3%
5.1%
3.4%
1.6%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
2.1%
1.8%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.1%
93.5%
92.5%
94.0%
85.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.9%
83.8%
83.8%
83.8%
83.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
70.3%
67.9%
67.8%
63.1%
67.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
11.4%
7.9%
9.9%
9.2%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.0%
0.8%
1.6%
1.7%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened