Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Kindred Seattle - First Hill

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Washington (WA)
  4. Seattle
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Kindred Seattle - First Hill

General Information

Legal Business NameThc Seattle Inc
Ownership TypeFor Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 25, 2012 (5 years)
Capacity23
Residents18
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsNone
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Kindred Seattle - First Hill

Kindred Seattle - First Hill
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 3 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Washington Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

June 28, 2016 - 12 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Receive registry verification that a nurse aide has met the required training and skills that the State requires; and 2) ensure nurse aides receive the required retraining after 24 months if nursing related services were not provided for monetary compe
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionPost nurse staffing information/data on a daily basis.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents with limited range of motion receive appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion or prevent further decrease in range of motion.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide care by qualified persons according to each resident's written plan of care.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

January 25, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.

April 20, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment by a qualified health professional.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionConduct initial and periodic assessments of each resident's functional capacity.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.
DFewPotential for HarmComplaint+InspectionDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program for mentally-ill and mentally-retarded patients.

April 2, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintGive residents a notice of rights, rules, services and charges.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Kindred Seattle - First Hill require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

2hr 30min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
20min
50min
ReportedExpected
LPN
2hr 5min
1hr 45min
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 60min
5hr 10min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 2hr 55min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

-
-
-
-
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
52.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
-
-
-
-
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
-
-
-
18.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
-
-
-
-
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
-
-
-
-
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
9.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
-
-
-
-
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
-
-
-
-
9.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
-
-
-
-
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
-
-
-
-
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
-
-
-
-
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
-
-
-
-
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

98.3%
97.7%
95.1%
97.8%
85.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
84.8%
90.6%
90.6%
90.6%
83.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
80.9%
72.1%
76.2%
87.2%
67.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
24.4%
37.5%
-
31.8%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
1.1%
3.2%
6.5%
2.7%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
0.7%
2.8%
3.4%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened