Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Providence Mount St Vincent

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Washington (WA)
  4. Seattle
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.9 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • ★★★★★ 3 months ago

    Amazing place,great staff, super clean, and great place to bring a loved one and or child for nursery. The view is ecstatic! Many nuns there and amazing older people. It is always super clean and the staff us always around making sure something gets done. Great place to be. I love going there and seeing happy older folks.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Nov. 11, 2015 They offer everything from independent living to temporary rehabilitative skilled nursing services to care for dementia. I have been here four times for probably an average of two weeks for rehabilitation of fractures. The staff I have dealt with is kind, patient, helpful and fun. However they don't always jump up to respond to call bells and they occasionally offer help and then forget. There is food available 24/7. You can be served in your room, in a small dining room on your floor and a maximum of 4 doors from your room or a cafeteria or a dining room. The food is good for cafeteria fare with a nice variety in the cafeteria. You can raid anytime the refrigerators and freezers on the therapy floor kitchens and a large glass front refrigerator in the cafeteria.They have a beautiful chapel, spectacular views, (you can see hills W. Seattle, across Elliott Bay with ferries to the Space Needle with Mt. Baker behind on a clear day) regular entertainment and pleasant outdoor areas. The therapists are good and patient but seldom exactly on time. The medical staff (I'm Group Health, other providers may be different) are seldom to be seen. I could write so much but suffice it to say, if you have to have skilled nursing care for a while this is a good place to be.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    The best rehab facility in Seattle area.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

    Among the best facilities for this type of care in Seattle.

  • ★★★★★ a year ago

About Providence Mount St Vincent

General Information

Legal Business NameProvidence Health & Services - Washington
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Church Related
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 1, 1968 ()
Capacity215
Residents172
Percent Occupied80%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Providence Mount St Vincent

Providence Mount St Vincent
was reviewed by to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Washington Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

August 5, 2016 - 16 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide necessary care and services to maintain or improve the highest well being of each resident .
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintDevelop and implement policies for 1) screening and training employees; and the 2) prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of any abuse, neglect, mistreatment and misappropriation of property.

January 14, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionKeep accurate, complete and organized clinical records on each resident that meet professional standards.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProperly care for residents needing special services, including: injections, colostomy, ureostomy, ileostomy, tracheostomy care, tracheal suctioning, respiratory care, foot care, and prostheses.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionDevelop a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionProvide activities to meet the interests and needs of each resident.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Providence Mount St Vincent require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 25min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
40min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 45min
1hr 5min
ReportedExpected
RN
5hr 30min
4hr 20min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 1hr 30min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

97.0%
95.7%
95.7%
95.7%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
100.0%
100.0%
99.3%
97.3%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
74.7%
68.4%
63.5%
73.2%
52.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
11.3%
10.7%
9.7%
10.3%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
14.3%
15.1%
19.8%
14.9%
18.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
8.6%
8.2%
8.3%
8.3%
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
8.7%
16.2%
7.9%
10.5%
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
14.7%
14.5%
11.0%
7.2%
9.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
7.9%
8.8%
7.6%
7.6%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
6.1%
3.1%
0.8%
2.4%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
23.4%
23.6%
25.2%
26.9%
9.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
11.2%
10.1%
4.9%
4.8%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
5.8%
6.0%
3.4%
2.0%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
3.1%
2.2%
2.5%
3.1%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

96.0%
97.1%
96.1%
95.0%
85.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
92.3%
97.6%
97.6%
97.6%
83.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
64.0%
61.9%
63.3%
60.9%
67.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
14.8%
15.5%
18.4%
16.3%
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.8%
0.8%
0.7%
0.3%
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.7%
0.2%
0.2%
0.5%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places