Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Yakima Valley School

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Washington (WA)
  4. Selah
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

About Yakima Valley School

General Information

Legal Business NameLegal Business Name Not Available
Ownership TypeGovernment - State
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareApril 21, 1994 (23 years)
Capacity160
Residents68
Percent Occupied43%
Program ParticipationMedicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsFamily
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Yakima Valley School

Yakima Valley School
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
* Data not availableStaff Rating
* Data not availableRN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Washington Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

July 27, 2016 - 11 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that residents are safe from serious medication errors.

April 15, 2016 - 15 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.

February 16, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintProvide routine and emergency drugs through a licensed pharmacist and only under the general supervision of a licensed nurse.

January 26, 2016 - 17 months ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionAssist those residents who need help with eating/drinking, grooming and personal and oral hygiene.

September 3, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
ESomePotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

April 8, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmComplaintEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provide adequate supervision to prevent avoidable accidents.

March 2, 2015 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure that each resident's 1) entire drug/medication regimen is free from unnecessary drugs; and 2) is managed and monitored to achieve highest level of well-being.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionEnsure residents maintain acceptable nutritional status.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth Inspection1) Hire only people with no legal history of abusing, neglecting or mistreating residents; or 2) report and investigate any acts or reports of abuse, neglect or mistreatment of residents.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Data Not Available

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
94.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
97.1%
97.1%
98.6%
97.1%
95.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
-
52.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
39.1%
33.8%
36.2%
37.1%
16.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
0.0%
8.1%
5.4%
4.2%
18.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
20.9%
21.2%
22.4%
22.4%
15.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
2.2%
2.1%
13.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
-
-
9.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
2.9%
2.9%
2.9%
2.9%
6.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
2.4%
0.0%
4.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
9.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
1.4%
4.4%
1.4%
2.9%
4.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
1.4%
1.4%
0.0%
1.2%
2.8%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
2.9%
1.5%
1.4%
1.4%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

86.2%
86.3%
89.4%
85.7%
85.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
89.0%
94.1%
94.1%
94.1%
83.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
-
-
-
67.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
-
-
-
-
18.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
-
-
-
-
1.6%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WA
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened