Search for Skilled Nursing by ZIP Code:  :

Schmitt Woodland Hills

  1. Home
  2. Skilled Nursing Home Facilities Directory
  3. Wisconsin (WI)
  4. Richland Center
Full Name

Phone Number

Email Address

City of interest
We value your privacy. By clicking, you agree to the terms and conditions of our privacy policy. You also consent that we can reach out to you using a phone system that can auto-dial numbers. Your consent is not required to use our service.

Search for nursing homes in your area

ZIP:

Reviews
Overall Rating 4.8 / 5.0 ★★★★★

  • Sheena Merwin
    ★★★★★ 10 months ago

    My grandfather is currently living here and this place is wonderful! They take great care of their residents and they truly care about the patients. I couldn't ask for a better group of people to look after my grandfather's well being!

  • Charity Hill
    ★★★★★ a year ago

    Schmitt has a great facility with caring staff. Lots of positive attitudes!

  • Margaret Draxler
    ★★★★★ 7 months ago

    Looks really nice

  • Rosanne Kidd
    ★★★★★ a month ago

  • George Hege Nursing Student
    ★★★★★ 9 months ago

About Schmitt Woodland Hills

General Information

Legal Business NameSchmitt Woodland Hills, Inc.
Ownership TypeNon Profit - Corporation
Changed Ownership In The Last 12 MonthsNo
First Accepted MedicareFebruary 25, 2004 (14 years)
Capacity50
Residents39
Percent Occupied78%
Program ParticipationMedicare And Medicaid
Resident And Family CouncilsResident
In HospitalNo
Continuing Care Retirement CommunityNo
Special Focus FacilityNo
Auto Sprinkler System In Required AreasYes

Ratings for Schmitt Woodland Hills

Schmitt Woodland Hills
was reviewed by Medicare to have a rating of 5 out of 5. About Medicare Ratings
Overall Rating
Health Inspections Rating
Quality Measures Rating
Staff Rating
RN Staff Rating

Overall Ratings of Wisconsin Nursing Homes

Fines, Complaints, and Inspection Problems in the Past 3 Years

Compare The Number of Problems

Types of Problems at Nursing Homes

Some issues within a nursing home are much more severe than others. Medicare evaluates each problem based on 2 scales: the number of residents affected by a problem and the severity of the potential or actual harm to residents based on the problem. We have color coded the matrix below to make it easier to pick out the more severe problems. In general, orange and red issues related to the treatment of a resident are considered substandard quality of care.

  Residents Affected
Severity of the Deficiency Few Some Many
Immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety J K L
Actual harm that is not immediate jeopardy G H I
No actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that is not immediate jeopardy D E F
No actual harm with potential for minimal harm A B C

January 8, 2016 - 2 years ago

 Residents AffectedSeveritySource/TypeDescription
FManyPotential for HarmHealth InspectionStore, cook, and serve food in a safe and clean way.
ESomePotential for HarmHealth InspectionHave a program that investigates, controls and keeps infection from spreading.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionMake sure that special or therapeutic diets are ordered by the attending doctor.
DFewPotential for HarmHealth InspectionGive residents proper treatment to prevent new bed (pressure) sores or heal existing bed sores.

Staffing Levels Per Resident per Day

Medicare determines the expected staffing time per resident per day depending on level of care the residents of Schmitt Woodland Hills require. It is important to compare the reported time to expected time for a single facility instead of comparing the amount of time per resident of two facilities. Learn why.

3hr 20min
2hr 35min
ReportedExpected
CNA
25min
35min
ReportedExpected
LPN
1hr 10min
1hr
ReportedExpected
RN
4hr 55min
4hr 15min
ReportedExpected
Total Nursing

This facility also provides approximately 35min per resident per WEEK of physical therapist time.

Quality Measures for Long Stay Residents

100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
96.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
92.6%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
97.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of long-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
-
-
40.0%
46.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of low risk long-stay residents who lose control of their bowels or bladder
3.8%
3.6%
6.5%
2.9%
19.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antianxiety or hypnotic medication
-
22.1%
10.8%
13.5%
17.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents whose ability to move independently worsened
3.7%
3.4%
0.0%
0.0%
12.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of long-stay residents who received an antipsychotic medication
12.5%
3.8%
13.8%
5.9%
14.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities has increased
-
-
0.0%
3.1%
8.7%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of long-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
11.1%
0.0%
6.1%
2.8%
7.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of long-stay residents who lose too much weight
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
5.9%
4.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of high risk long-stay residents with pressure ulcers
7.7%
6.9%
0.0%
0.0%
5.5%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of long-stay residents who have depressive symptoms
7.4%
0.0%
2.9%
2.7%
4.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection
7.4%
6.9%
5.9%
7.9%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of long-stay residents experiencing one or more falls with major injury
5.1%
0.0%
0.0%
9.7%
3.4%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of long-stay residents with a catheter inserted and left in their bladder
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.3%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of long-stay residents who were physically restrained

Quality Measures for Short Stay Residents

89.7%
88.9%
90.0%
93.2%
89.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of short-stay residents assessed and appropriately given the pneumococcal vaccine
-
91.1%
91.1%
91.1%
86.1%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who were assessed and appropriately given the seasonal influenza vaccine
-
82.0%
81.8%
86.1%
73.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
* The data for this facility for some quarters is unavailable.
Percentage of short-stay residents who made improvements in function
5.9%
2.9%
7.5%
8.0%
19.9%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of short-stay residents who self-report moderate to severe pain
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
1.2%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of short-stay residents who newly received an antipsychotic medication
4.2%
2.2%
1.7%
0.0%
1.0%
Q4 2015Q1 2016Q2 2016Q3 2016WI
Percentage of short-stay residents with pressure ulcers that are new or worsened



Some page content retrieved from Google Places